That's because it's just gambling.
Nougat
"Tell me you don't know how reddit works without saying you don't know how reddit works."
Sure, but they're rat balls, having been included with the rat penis transplant.
Deficiency signalling.
What even counts as "performing" there?
The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors”
So ... Infowars, Fox News, OAN, Answers in Genesis, JW, Texas.gov ... right?
Or, all the porn sites should just put huge amounts of public domain works and open source repositories on their sites, so that less than one-third is "harmful to minors."
I'm glad I could help!
It's on par with a thought experiment. The notion is still one worth considering, even if it is impractical or unsuitable to create a literal test based on it.
Oh sure - and I didn't mean it to be pointing a finger at you, either. I just remembered the Sweden thing and thought it was contextual.
Fraud, yes, but it certainly does seem that she overlooked a whole lot of red flags on the way.
For the record, any DNS server you choose to employ should default to only using the root servers. You would need to configure your own forwarder IP(s) to point to a general purpose resolver.
You should also be aware that even if you use root servers, a DNS server which is authoritative for the domain you are querying may well return different results depending on where in the world you are. This can be in order to direct you to an IP that is closer to you, or because "different global locations get different content" for any reason, including censorship and malicious goals. The latter is definitely less likely than the former, but it's just as possible.