Numberone

joined 1 year ago
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago

Wow, didn't know about the cats or that there was a puzzle in the bathroom. Time to finish this game MORE I guess.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just finished it for the first time, have been telling all my friends about it. There's something about how messy the lore is. Some collectables don't tell you anything except shape the atmosphere of the oldest house, which is so nice. It was so beautiful too. Really good low flying game. I'm gonna definitely check out some other titles by this studio. I've played AW 1 and loved the connections to that. Just a real surprising 10/10 for me.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago

Ha...guess I'm the asshole. But I still hate teams alright!

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've had to repeatedly switcho "new teams". The selection isn't sticky for some reason. It seems like it shouldn't be that hard to develope a messaging app that does file transfers and meetings but apparently this bloated pile of horseshit proves reason wrong. A second long delay when changing threads? "You'll use it because corporate says you will...and you'll LOVE IT".

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

And now you know something about me😋

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Added, sorry for the delay.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

Added. Sorry for the delay.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Is linked to excess deaths? Technically it could be saving lives at a population scale. I doubt that's the case, but it could be. I'll read the article now and find out.

Edit: it doesn't seem to say anything regarding "normal" auto related deaths. They're focusing on the bullshit designation of an unfinished product as "autopilot",and a (small) subset of specific cases that are particularly aggregious, where there were 5-10 seconds of lead time into an incident. In these cases a person who was paying attention wouldn't have been in the accident.

Also some clarity edits.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago

Here is a wiki source (insert error bars here) discussion of his stance on his work being officially licensed. He thought that use of his work outside of a comic strip would cheapen the value of the strip itself. This was frusterating as a child (who wouldn't want a fucking Hobbes plushy) but now later I can see that it was at the very least a very defensible choice. Compare how people feel about C&H vs something that was commercialized to death like Garfield. Anyway, hope it's useful.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

In the book "Highrisers", which is about the Cabrini-Greens housing developement in Chicago, there's a short section talking about how certain buildings were turned over to the tennents in a management capacity. It didn't fix all of the problems, and it didn't save Cabrini-Greens, but it did have some measure of success over beurocratic management by CHA, which was a joke. (FWIW I read this several years ago, so take it with a grain of salt)

That model has stuck out in my mind since. Why not have a simple budget for each building and let the work of maintenance be managed by the people who live there, with resources from the appropriate housing authority. The US is so fucking paternalistic about poverty and the people living in it. We build huge beurocracies incapable of truly scaling that then result in obsene waste like shown above. With some management some of that could be put on tennents, with them keeping some of benefits as well.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago

My friend appreciates your friend. 🖖

view more: next ›