OsaErisXero

For parody it would have to be untrue, yes?

Even if it's obvious, it's still important to say

The problem being, at least for the moment, the crazy is winning

Can't imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

If ace combat has taught me anything, it's that there's no reason we can't do both

Surely you know better than to ask that, Satan

This is not precisely accurate. These are individually addressible and can be commanded to change what's displayed based on any arbitrary input, such as detection of a critical mass of apple products in that part of the store, or a device which is signed into a store account on the store app, accurate down to about 3 meters last time I looked at the state of presence analytics tech. So you absolutely could have 20% higher prices follow a person around a store if you wanted to.

The best part is that it's likely almost all true.

Sounds like someone needs a visit from their democracy officer

Won't somebody please think of the shareholders

A lot of risk narcing on someone irl

I would imagine a production version of this would have predefined cut lines to pull a chunk out for working on stuff in or under the foundation