OsaErisXero

joined 8 months ago
[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 9 points 7 months ago

Modern problems require modern solutions

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, identity is a real problem, but someone posted a proposal to solve for that that looks perfect for this sort of thing. Wish I remembered what it was called, but basically each account could attest for the others via export of encryption keys/signatures so while you has multiple 'accounts' there was only one identity which was pointed to in the signature blob.

The tricky part would be getting everyone (matrix, lemmy/kbin/mbin, pixel fed, and masto) to conform to a single identity standard. If one existed, I could see them implementing it, but we're not there yet.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I can sort of see why a chat client wouldn't have a use for activitypub/federation, with the possible exception of identity sharing once that starts to take off.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 6 points 8 months ago

Hey, I resemble that remark!

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This. Usually we're bitching about the feds just ignoring basic development principles and making shit up as they go along like there wasn't 30 years of hard learned lessons to lean on; this is the first time I can think of where what they're doing actually makes some sense.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

~~What fresh hell is this~~ Didn't see the Readme link at first pass

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It would not*

*Does not apply in the 5th circuit

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know where you got that 20% statistic, but everything I've read and can find on short notice has it up around 70%.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 3 points 8 months ago

Yep, and if they're not behind 10 vpns and a randomly generated username then they're going to get sued into oblivion before close of business Friday

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, i know, but my point was if you were designing a wall material to block 5ghz you would end up with plaster on wire mesh. Couldn't have been better if it were on purpose

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run -3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That chicken wire could have been intentionally designed to absorb 5ghz signal, and is death to it. Literally any other material would be fine up to 3 rooms away depending on the noise floor in the space. 6ghz /might/ be able to punch through depending on the width of the space between the wires though, and might be worth exploring in your case.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 13 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but companies always skimp on IT, be it infra or something as basic as laptops.

view more: ‹ prev next ›