OurToothbrush

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

You know plenty of Chinese people speak English right? And Chinese citizens can pretty trivially bypass the firewall, the point of the firewall is protectionism for China's tech sector.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow that is a lot of citations needed.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Except imperialism is actually incredibly inefficient in the long term. Western nations become imperialist due to the contradictions created by capitalism.There is a reason why China's foreign policy is centered around mutual advancement.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sure, if you know literally nothing about the military industrial complex and government capture and its role in creating war, and you want to buy into the propaganda that the US only attacks when it feels threatened.

When countries are threatened and dropping bombs relieves that threat instead of increases it, then they do.

Settler-brained-as-fuck idea about how conflict works

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Who decides what speech threatens the government? The government.

Uhuh. In other words, governments restrict speech that they think threatens them.

I can say fuck Joe Biden, fuck Donald Trump, and fuck every member of Congress and the Supreme Court. Can you point me towards someone living in China who’s comfortable openly saying “fuck Xi Jinping?”

First off, how many Chinese people have you actually talked to? You know there are Chinese people on the internet that you can talk to, right? And foreign exchange students? You can even visit the country if you want.

And yes, you're free to say things that don't actually threaten the US, like saying fuck Trump or Fuck Biden. You're allowed to be as ineffectual as you'd like. Compare your statements to all the black lives matter organizers who've been found to commit suicide by bullets to the back of the head or public hanging from trees.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The mere suggestion that the state is illegitimate in China would have gotten me disappeared.

China has a smaller surveillance state than the US, so I doubt it. Also yeah, the US hasn't faced serious coup attempts in the last 50 years.

So it makes you wonder if ruling with an iron fist and crushing dissidents has some merit after all.

Their execution or imprisonment stats must be much higher than the US! Wait. I'm just hearing.. oh dear.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean- yeah, the birdcage model has been supplanted by majority public ownership at this point, the same incentives that create the military industrial complex don't exist- if you'd like, i would recommend reading "Economy and Class Structure of German Fascism" which can be a handy reference point for the US military complex.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

From the KMT, from the Japanese, or from the feudal lords that re-established themselves during the Chinese Civil War?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

A million Uyghurs, whose only apparent crime is being Muslim, have been sent to labor camps and undergone forced sterilization.

Do you know the sources of these claims? Because you're repeating stuff that was first spread around by a German Christian nationalist (a euphemism) employed by a cia front group, which had already been debunked, and could be debunked by anyone looking at his methodology who is able to read mandarin.

Why is this myth pushed so hard by western countries which slaughter Muslims by the millions, and are engaged in genocide against a majority Muslim population as we speak?

Why do Muslim delegations visiting uniformly support the way China has treated its minority Muslim populations? Before you say sectarianism, investigate and realize that the delegations were intentionally multi-sectarian.

Tiananmen Square started out as people peacefully protesting government corruption, and ended in the state murdering them.

How violently do you think the US would have responded to US protestors trying to overthrow the government when they start burning and lynching to death unarmed soldiers? You can still find photos online of mutilated PLA soldiers corpses from june 2nd. 300 or so dead, including the soldiers that were killed, seems pretty light. Oh wait, the US military would never show up to a protest not armed to the teeth, silly me.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (22 children)

You do understand that free speech that doesn't threaten the government is tolerated everywhere, right? Us having more free speech here is just a function of the US government feeling more secure in its power, you can still find examples of free speech being punished in the US when it has threatened its power.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Have you read anything on what imperialism actually is?

I would suggest reading Lenin's "Imperialism"

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So your argument is the geographical boundaries mean when a country is split it is imperialism to unite it again?

Imagine if the confederacy retreated to the keys islands, that's sort of the level of ridiculous here. The right wing losers of a civil war retreated to an island that was and is considered part of the country.

 
 
 
 
view more: next ›