Paradoxvoid

joined 2 years ago
[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Definitely wouldn't be surprised - MS have been making noises about reducing the level of access non-core Windows services get after the cloudstrike fiasco, and given MS's patch stability lately, I would also not be surprised if something leaked out early.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 7 points 8 months ago

It's funny how when this was released, people were massively up in arms since it was 'only cosmetic' - then we saw what these companies would do with PvP games and P2W microtransactions, so people had to turn around and beg for them to return to being purely cosmetic additions...

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 9 points 9 months ago

This is why I absolutely refuse to install Valorant (and now LoL) - I could somewhat understand if an anticheat refused to boot up the game in question if something triggered it, but it going massively outside of its scope and wantonly disabling or killing other processes is just nuts to me.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You do you, but if you're reverting to binary to explain how simple it is to add values together, I think you've made a wrong turn somewhere.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Those are so easily commensurable! It's 1 and 59/64 obv.

I legit can't tell if this is sarcasm.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I don't think broad brushstrokes are helpful here - regular people can be real assholes, and we need to balance a public servant's individual right to privacy with the public's right to transparency.

Some jobs such as Police Officers, I have no qualms with filming while they're in uniform or otherwise on-the-job. But I can also see how a blanket approval could backfire, e.g. some aggrieved person decides to stalk some poor guy who's only job is to center divs on some government website, just because they find out he's a government worker.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People saying Steam doesn't have a monopoly because other stores exist, is the same as saying Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on PC Gaming because Mac and Linux exist. Technically true, but ultimately meaningless because its their market power that determines a monopoly, not whether there are other niche players.

While Valve and Steam have generally been a good player, and currently do offer the best product, they still wield an ungodly amount of influence over the PC gaming market space.

Epic is chasing that because they really want what Valve has, though no doubt they plan to speedrun the enshittification process as soon as they think it safe.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think this is technically a loop.