Pirasp

joined 1 year ago
[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

You are right, machines could work for smaller/standardized stuff πŸ€”

As for scammers, since kind of fake recall where you have to for some reason pay something in advance probably. But trust scammers and grifters to figure something out, they always do.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If the key is only held by the doe then how are you ever going to get that deposit? Bring your trash to them? If not then everyone needs to have access, which means no encryption. One could of course feasibly leave out who bought the thing. To prevent fraud though you would probably have to save what the thing is (otherwise someone will just produce trash in China with valid token IDs from the database just to get the deposit) and having a database of that is in it self a very bad thing for businesses at least. You don't want your competitors to know exactly how much you are selling, otherwise you will definitely get bought out at your lowest point.

Maintaining such a database would be a nightmare too, and all that just to make sure the tokens do fall in value with inflation? I don't see the point really. Either fix the value for a couple of years, or let it rise through inflation that would incentivize the collection of old garbage at least.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Oh, no. I'm quite aware. The companies that can do it have a large enough effect in my life as it is. I really do not wish for scammers, random trolls, foreign government or home invader (tracking where you are based on purchases) to join them.

Right now I can make it hard for the big players by using the right tools and services. This would make it completely impossible.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If you want to sell a product you would have to register that deposit in the database, similarly if you get it back you have to access the database to know how much to pay out. If you don't want to limit selling products to large businesses everyone needs access.

Sure, consequences for littering are fun and all, but the passive surveillance that allows is terrifying imho.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

And how exactly would you do that? One giant database of sales that everyone just has access to? Print it on the thing at time of sale? I can't see any trivial solution, I'd be interested in yours tho!

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Even if it was scattered everywhere you would definitely have people pick it back up for the deposit. That works with bottles in Germany and the deposit for them gets as low as 8ct.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Because the deposit is tied to inflation. Older products might end up with way outdated deposits if you print the sum on the packaging, so it would have to be token based. The token is then inflation safe.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (15 children)

That would make having a mountain of long lived useless trash a solid inflation safe investment plan.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 79 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I mainly kill animals to enjoy the silence that comes after.

Damn mosquitoes sound annoying AF!

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, I want to be told, when they don't find micro plastics somewhere.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The last point is always funny to me, because cans are plastic bottles inside of aluminum bottles. There is less plastic at least, I guess.

 
view more: next β€Ί