Pronell

joined 2 years ago
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It is definitely not too late for that.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The recipients signed off on the sale.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In 1983 or so I bought a Japanese themed RPG for the Apple IIe published by EA.

It didn't like the disk drive we had, so the copy protection would reboot over and over.

There were only two models of disk drive for the Apple IIe.

EA has always been this way.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That would've been so much funnier if you'd used the backslash.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The Aristocrats!

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 116 points 4 months ago (10 children)

And they were there because the energy use of the MRI made them suspect it was a pot farm... in a legal state.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Granted I've never been injured, but I've gotten small pieces of bone shards several times throughout my life from shredded chicken type stuff.

I dunno if they refused to pay medical bills because that'd be fucked.

But if you kill a creature, cook and debone it, yeah, occasionally a bit of bone will make it through.

You can still call it boneless, because you knew you were buying meat from a creature that normally has bones and an effort has been made to remove said bones.

I hate to say I side with the Ohio Supreme Court but I think I do.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Totally agreed. Sentencing is insane and discretion was taken away from judges by congress long ago.

I'm more pointing out where he is within that system that arguing for reform. I'm not against said reform, but it's a totally different topic.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (6 children)

There's no punishment, they're telling him that if he wants early release and intends to perform, that the content of his performance be reviewed ahead of time.

Because he would never have been able to have that performance AT ALL if still incarcerated.

He is asking for early release and it is being granted with certain restrictions.

People on probation get sent back when they break laws, violating the terms of that probation. This guy hasn't gotten to probation yet and is more restricted.

I see your point though, and it would be double jeopardy if they fully released him while continuing to punish him in other ways. That just isn't what's happening here. He's trying to get out early.

view more: next ›