QBertReynolds

joined 1 year ago
[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's ugly for sure, but I think the biggest barrier to entry is the shortcut keys. Blender's Industry Standard mode makes it a lot easier for Maya users to switch. Something similar for Photoshop users would kill.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Yes. So far, the CHIPS Act has resulted in $6.6b in direct funding and an additional $5b in available loans for the AZ facility.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps unauthorized is a better word than counterfeit. The manufacturing process for CPUs often yields less than ideal chips. Perhaps they don't hit the clock speed they're supposed to, or maybe they consume too much power. Those chips are supposed to be discarded, but they often find their way to the black market. Sometimes those chips aren't even failures. If a fab overproduces, they're not just going to give Apple the extra chips. These are the things Apple worries about, and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

I should also point out that the CPU isn't the only chip that TSMC makes for Apple. Apple wants to make sure they're getting a cut of every replacement part that gets sold. You can't even swap screens on two brand new iPhones without Apple giving you a hard time.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Apple wants to cut down on counterfeiting. The US wants to prevent supply chain issues and reduce reliance on foreign chip production. The wiki article on the CHIPS Act is a pretty good overview: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

All fair points. I don't fly much and it's been such a long time since I've been carded that I don't really think about using it for stuff like that.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Must be nice. I can't remember the last time I drove across Louisiana and didn't get pulled over in some podunk town whose only source of income is speeding tickets. We've had digital IDs here for years, and I can't help but think that getting people to handover an unlocked phone is exactly the point.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

When has a cop ever approached your car with an NFC reader?

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Discussion from when this was posted yesterday: https://lemmy.world/post/19055957

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I've never understood the appeal of digital driver's licenses. If I get pulled over, there's no fucking way I'm unlocking my phone and handing it to a cop.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

From the article you clearly didn't read:

Photography has been used in the service of deception for as long as it has existed. (Consider Victorian spirit photos, the infamous Loch Ness monster photograph, or Stalin’s photographic purges of IRL-purged comrades.)

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I read it on their sources page at some point, but it looks like that page has changed since last I looked.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

That's technically true, but it's as misleading as saying they get their search results from Yandex. Their results are aggregated from several search engines, not just Bing. They also have their own web crawler, DuckDuckBot, which absolutely respects RobotRules.

Edit: I'm told my information is out of date. No more Yandex because of Uncle Sam. Yahoo is just Bing now, so that index doesn't count anymore. The bulk of the rest of their sources are largely inconsequential specialized search engines. Their sources page states that they "largely source from Bing".

view more: next ›