QinShiHuangsShlong

joined 1 month ago
[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 5 points 22 hours ago

No you're not understanding what I'm saying. "ML" is not a group in the fashion of Ansar Allah or Hamas or so on. It's a descriptor applied to an individual who is then a member of a group with others who may or may not also fit that descriptor. That group then does things and takes credit as a group.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

An important distinction here is that Ansar Allah is a militant group while "ml" is simply a political descriptor. There is no group or party called ml. ML's make up a large portion of communist party and other groups membership alongside others who describe themselves with other labels.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 8 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I don’t see mls driving out ICE from MN.

Well the server you are on ends in .ml to mean marxist lenninist, so yeah they are kind of labeled.

Didn't really answer my main question since that doesn't really apply in the situation described.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Ok just to preface I am not amerikkkan so outside looking on on your many issues.

But genuine question how do you see an ml? Can you read their mind? Or do you expect them to label themselves as such on a name tag or sign? What of the people who are for all intents and purposes ml but simply don't take on the label for one reason or another? Feels like you're making a lot of assumptions based on vibes.

Also another question. Voting isn't just voting under your system as I understand it. It's a multi year process of canvassing and related work. So if bourgeois-democracy has been shown to be a dead end repeatedly throughout history it feels like wasting the hundreds of hours to prep and do it is a real misallocation of resources no?

Spreading agit-prop, showing up for "protests" (parades in the American case from what I've seen (this is a whole separate tangent I could go on)) and generally teaching arming and doing socialist work seems much more valuable use of time. Not hyper familiar with American orgs so I would defer to the likes of cowbee to explain in detail what the orgs are actually doing with the saved resources.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (29 children)

The so-called democratic system in modern states is usually monopolized by the bourgeoisie and has become simply an instrument for oppressing the common people.

Chairman Mao pushing the people to voting the Japanese imperialists and KMT fascists off the mainland:

Political power grows from the ballot box or something

There was a lot of talk of Chinese weapons systems but all we’re seeing is Shaheds and Iranian domestic missiles.

Both of these are made using materials from China. Rocket fuel precursor and duel use drone components (also SAM components which seem to have had some luck downing Israeli drones).

Or those hypersonic anti ship missiles.

Iran are using their old stock they haven't even started using their own hypersonic FATTAH-1s what makes you think they'd bring out the even more advanced Chinese stock they might have?

Meanwhile NATO is sending troops and weapons from every country including the European ones. And they even participate in intercepting Iranian missiles. Looks like Capitalist international solidarity is far superior.

Almost like when the current hegemon and it's vassal's have nuclear weapons and they decide to take direct action against non nuclear powers MAD makes it near impossible for rival nuclear powers to step in personally.

Please don't take this the wrong way I'm not trying to call you out or any of that nonsense, but from the 2 of your posts where we've had brief interactions it feels like you have a set outcome in mind (China bad) and are twisting yourself in knots to to reach that point irrespective of facts or material reality.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

I believe we didn’t invade Iraq until 2003.

I think they meant Afghanistan in 2001.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should regard it not as a dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of learning terms and phrases but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution. It is not just a matter of understanding the general laws derived by Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin from their extensive study of real life and revolutionary experience, but of studying their standpoint and method in examining and solving problems.

Chairman Mao's 红宝书 Chapter 33 on Study

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nope, just makes it even more hilarious because you’re still here in the west when it sounds like you can naturally move back to the warm welcome of the CCP.

I'm in China dipshit what part of Chinese made house did you not understand.

I’m not the one who spouts bullshit propaganda all day long.

Actually lmao one of the funniest things I've heard in a while.

Yep, kinda sounds like your utopia abuses it’s people…

It was so abusive when the government eradicated poverty, invested hugely in a world class public transport system, electrified and modernised rural villages.

You don't know shit and should shut the fuck up. Chauvinist ass crackkker. Can't wait to piss on your empires grave when you return to being a serf to your pedo overlords. 🤣 👉

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 26 points 4 days ago (5 children)

western tech

Made in China

You criticise society yet you participate in it curious

Was your brain surgically removed as a child?

Ruzzia

Why did you pick Russia over China, Vietnam, Laos, DPRK? Russia isn't socialist and there is critical support for them at best.

Also preempting this I am Chinese, I live in a Chinese built house, typing on a Chinese phone, does that make my criticism of the genocidal imperialist Euro-Amerikan empire more valid?

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Great slogan unfortunately not how it works in the modern reality of imperialism and neocolonialism, the class struggle can only truly begin after the premier contradiction of national liberation has been resolved.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

One of the very few true things he's said.

view more: next ›