Quacksalber

joined 1 year ago
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I didn't understand the meme I responded to to be exclusively talking about piracy.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm not saying that the scarcity of digital goods isn't bullshit, but it's rarely what keeps people poor.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Wait, wasn't the whole point of climate change that we use more resources than the ecosystem can replenish?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't say the big R-word or they'll remove your post. That'd be POLITICS! Even if it is directly related to what you're talking about.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It certainly looks that way.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 157 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Counter argument: The maintainers could "easily" relocate to a country that is not currently conducting an invasion to enlarge its territory.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is the megathread outdated? It has entries that both don't work anymore and were already removed in earlier versions.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Germany, those letters come with a fine, which they can sue you over, if you don't pay.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Honestly as a German, torrenting seems to be way too risky. Internet providers will immediately cave when they are contacted about an IP adress they control and there are multiple law firms whose only business model seems to be sending out c&d letters.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think Lemmy/Mbin would benefit from 'moderation pools'. The basic idea is that, if you subscribe to or join a moderation pool, your instance will automatically copy any moderation action taken on content your instance also hosts. This would allow multiple single-admin instances to moderate even during off-hours of any single admin.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

One statement that always works with republicans: Every accusation is an admission.

 

After having spent some time on Lemmy and learning of the intricacies of the different Lemmy instances, I think the landing page for the Lemmyverse could do with some streamlining. I remember that back when I joined, the only information I used to decide on an instance to join was the user count, the signup policy and the instance name. Now, coming from the instance with the best name, I can't say that I've regretted my choice, but for new people looking to join Lemmy, crucial information that would help them join the instance best suited for them is still missing.

To provide that information, I want to suggest the creation of multiple categories, in which instance owners are encouraged to describe their instance. Instances that provide a description for each category are then ranked higher on the join-lemmy.org website.

The following categories would, in my opinion, help new users decide on an instance to join:

Content Policy
This category could describe what kind of content the instance wants to specialize in. Whether that be sports, games, specific sports teams or games, NSFW content, meme content, etc.

Signup Policy
The website already shows whether an application needs to be filled out, but it doesn't show what is expected of the applicant. A category describing what exactly the instance would like to see in their new users would help those users decide, if that instance is for them or not.
As an example, an instance focussed on a certain language could inform users, that they expect an application in that language.

Community creation Policy
Here, instances could describe what rules they have around community creation. Small instances could, for example, clarify in this category, that they would only want to host niche communities without much traction at most. Other servers could specify that they would only want to host unique communities, not copies of or communities closely related to communities already existing on other instances.

Federation Policy
Here instance owners could clarify their stance on what other instances they are willing or not willing to federate with. To give an example, instances could describe their stance on federating with other instances hosting NSFW content, possibly illegal content (lemmy.world and /c/piracy), overly political content, and so on and so forth.

Lastly, some statistics could be added to show the health of the instance: Active user to inactive user ratio, active user to report ratio, active user/report to mod action ratio, community engagement ratio, uptime, server software version and so on.

With these categories, I can say that if I were to join the Lemmyverse today, I'd be able to make a much more informed decision on what instance to join.

view more: next ›