Rampsquatch

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not giving the Chinese myth dragon "defence". She's not real. Full stop. It's okay if you don't like it

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Dude, she isn't real.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Biological males can also lactate, it just takes a lot more effort.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

And that was an actual remake, not just a 14 years late PC port.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not mad I just don't trust the Devs of Star Citizen. I think their monetization as a whole reeks of a scam and I don't understand why people defend it.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Oh it's not one tech demo, it's several. They aren't connected. If they aren't connected it isn't a game. People just don't want to admit they were scammed when they "bought" that fancy ship in that "game".

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't even know that game existed until I saw headlines saying it failed. It wasn't marketed well and I would bet that was on purpose. I think they knew it was terrible, why else wouldn't they try to sell it?

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (13 children)

It's easy to ignore actually. Where game? I don't care how pretty your tech demo is. Where game?

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Based on the history of the company I say: bullshit.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm happy for you if you do, I just can't justify spending what publishers are asking most of the time. Every now and then a title comes along that for me is worth it, those times are getting more and more infrequent as the prices climb.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Both of those are too high in my currency, let alone in USD.

view more: next ›