Redjard

joined 2 years ago
[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see. That does seem far fetched though, and really only holds any plausability once your ID doesn't match your own claim.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 57 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's also completely fine under all international law.
Following copyright law is more like a trade agreement, so if you feel wronged enough as a nation it's completely uncontroversial to suspend all or all international copyright law and deal with the consequences (mainly the us being very salty about it).

The EU contingency for a US attack on Greenland for example is among other steps to suspend all US copyrights recognition and starve the US service industry.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah but then if they pass your id and agree to the bribery they'll give you the 100$? It's the wrong way around to be bribery.

Bribery needs pass and pay, this is pass or pay. The incentive for the storekeeper is to not sell to you and get the money.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I was already in the middle of posting this to !dontyouknowwhoiam@lemmy.world before seeing the remainder of your post :)

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How is it related to bribery?