Rednax

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Software engineers call this rubber duck debugging

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There is also an art to keeping it short. No need to sit at a table for 5 hours. After an hour you should know if you want to go do something together.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I doubt they do mich different than you do with their OS.

People are more motivated by feelings than actual logic. The person you are responding to even states that Ubuntu "feels good to use". That is some car advertisement level of feeling based reasoning.

Another thing is that people really hate it when things change. Especially a UI change. Every change in the Windows UI has been met with disgust. And if there is one thing different between linux distros, it's where they place all the buttons, menus, etc. So people prefer to stay with the distro they know.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When life gives you oranges...

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just like orbiting something. Satellites are constantly just falling back to earth, but with enough grace to always miss earth. I bet satellites would be great cyclists!

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is a matter of responsibility. If you can log into any lemmy instance or mastodon server with the same account, then which server takes responsibility for your actions in the fediverse?

I have seen instances be defederate from because of their lax account creation requirements, or because of harrasment from users from a specific instance.

If an account can log into any instance, then who is responsible for banning the account?

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  1. It reduces the barrier of entry for new users to get an account going that is not flooded by political extremist views in it's feed.
  2. It causes anonymous users to not see they shitshow. And since most users start out by browsing anonymously while deciding whether they want an account or not, that is a big deal.
  3. It gives the impression that this community is at least somewhat ok with the views that these extremists hold.

It should be opt-in to view posts and comments from these sources.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

My apologies. You weren't arguing against the articles premise, but against the premise that there are no good current RTS games. Ignore my blabering.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Starcraft 2 is almost 14 years old.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The CEO from the article is also making an RTS. He is not claiming they are unprofitable. He is saying they are not mainstream enough to sell tens of millions of copies.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

According to steamDB AoE IV has between 1.27 and 2.5 million owners. That is a good number, but not mainstream. At the very least not mainstream in the definition used in the article.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I also used to save up every potion and usuable that I came across. I wanted to feel in control by being prepared for everything. That sounds like a fine quality to have, but it stems from a fear of not being able to handle whatever is thrown at you. It is a symptom of a lack of self confidence.

Nowadays the things that I'm most proud of in life, are things I only achieved because I jumped head first into the unknown, yet still came out on top of whatever challenge I had taken on.

view more: next ›