Robaque

joined 2 years ago
[–] Robaque@feddit.it 8 points 4 months ago

Absolutely! He simply has a very original take on "freedom", but we all know that's a tricky word to pin down, so don't think about it too much, and leave it to the big dogs to tell you when your freedom is being protected.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 2 points 5 months ago

They can use the state to do that for them

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

and the company

Surely the company would never be just as authoritarian as the state!

~ [cue anti-consumer subscription models and user policies]

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 17 points 6 months ago

Say what you want about marxist-leninists but they're not "very extreme right fascists". Do you have any evidence for your claim or are you just doing your part in decreasing political literacy?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You could share this sublemmy's pinned post, or the megathread it links to:

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/10901

https://rentry.co/megathread

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ik it's only anecdotal, but I played Brawl Stars when it was in beta and witnessed almost all its updates until global launch (and have caught up with some more recent updates here and there). It went from a genuinely fun mobile game with character and potential to a plastic husk primed for whatever monetisation and "engagement" strategies analytics says needs to be shoved into it next.

At the time I couldn't fathom how all those updates that often made gameplay and progression less fun could ever be more "engaging" (the change from portrait to landscape in particular felt like straight up poor game design, trashing its unique mobile control schemes in favour of digital twin joysticks and "autoaim"), but in hindsight it's clear what that really meant.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 10 points 10 months ago
[–] Robaque@feddit.it 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We're in the age of the technofeudalists

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe he could even do a little VR prison tour

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When you talk about communism, are you talking about marxist-leninist / socialist states, or communism the idea(l) itself? Also how familiar are you with anarchism?

It seems that in the same way, people in this discussion have defined that communism is the mechanism for being generous and being willing to contribute to society.

You're not far off, but yes that is more or less all that "communism" is:

a classless, stateless, humane society based on common ownership, follows the maxim "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

There is no prescription for how this may be achieved or how it might operate. Marxist-leninists want to reach it with a vanguard party and a socialist state, and this reflects how they see revolution as an event. Anarcho-communists instead see revolution as a process, and praxis takes the form of grassroots movements, aiming to bring about the necessary social change, building systems of free association from the ground up.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 11 points 1 year ago

They don't exist

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course capitalism operates in a lot of gray areas, it's how it seems freer than it actually is. "I need food" isn't always a problem, but it is one often enough to be systemically problematic. Abandoning one's hopes and dreams because one must be "realistic" is the norm.

 

Jamrock Hobo's response to People Make Game's investigation

view more: next ›