You know who. ChatGPT.
RootBeerGuy
Sounds fair to me
Are you serious? It's Microsoft.
That's a big point that also usually isn't really distinguished in all these studies, especially the ones about children and screen time.
I feel there are differences between just watching cartoons and playing some involving game.
Also, just walking by a TV that's on is also screen time, or not? Is the TV running in the background at home screen time when you only look at it 5 minutes here and there?
I'd be happy if those studies would clearly state, 4 hours social media per day is bad. Or 4 hours watching TV with at least 30 minutes long sessions is bad. Stuff like that.
Well yeah. Turns out you are not the average user. Don't mean that neither as a compliment nor an insult.
The fork isn't
Firefish > Iceshrimp
Hilarious, makes me kind of want to see it fail again just to see what people come up with as the next name in line.
I actually always wondered about the y in old texts. Thanks!
The enforcing part is where this is likely to get shitty. Once they establish this as a law they maybe will try and sue companies that don't provide an age check on their websites. Now if that is possible I am not sure, seeing as many of those are having HQs in Ireland or Netherlands due to tax reasons.
But if that is successful it would mean they actually have to check everyone's age by some means, which means collecting IDs. Which definitely is bad news for users, we all know that data won't be securely stored or deleted.
Not sure how else this could go down.
Pharaos were the OG preppers.
Not an expert so I might be wrong, but as far as I understand it, those specialised tools you describe are not even AI. It is all machine learning. Maybe to the end user it doesn't matter, but people have this idea of an intelligent machine when its more like brute force information feeding into a model system.
They have no reason to change that. They will long term want the exact same thing that twitter has, access to all user data and control of the platform.