I can always just buy a Windows licence
Or use massgrave.dev and get it for free.
I can always just buy a Windows licence
Or use massgrave.dev and get it for free.
Like if you produce bottled water, and you lower the quality of it (like, idk maybe theres stuff floating inside) so its cheaper to make, people will notice and switch to an alternative. And when the alternative tries something similar, they'll switch back to you.
So now you have 2 companies selling bottled water with stuff floating in it.
I suddenly feel enlightened.
Fedora because it has (IMO) the best vanilla GNOME experience. Every application is in the same theme and looks similar.
Are there any with gyro?
the things you listed are most certainly not a requirement.
Then what are? Why wouldn't the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell be requirements for ownership?
If "ownership" doesn't have a unified meaning, then I can interpret "ownership" as the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell the bought item.
You were arguing that having control over something (as in "being able to maintain/repair, modify or even resell" it) isn't a requirement for the thing's ownership?
Then what does "ownership" entail? Being allowed to use the thing but not modify or repair it? I'd argue that this isn't what "ownership" means.
So what does "ownership" mean then for software?
!usernamechecksout@lemmy.zip ~200 subscribers
!usernamechecksout@lemmy.ca ~100 subscribers
!usernamechecksout@lemmy.ml ~40 subscribers
You can still play Roblox with Sober. Just sometimes it doesn't work (like during bigger events).