Shanedino

joined 1 year ago
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago

Still better than Disney!

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You don't put that you were fired on your resume though...

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The other part of it is they broke the rules so they need to face the consequences. They are asking for forgiveness and in this case I don't think they deserve it.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Maybe if you would pay for training data they would let you use copyright data or something?

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nope there is no actual worm in the box, only magic smoke.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Hmm seems odd to me. I personally would not have even thought anyone would have second guessed pressing the button.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

Gotta equalize out the people who make ai their whole personality. Also I am completely just shitposting, feel free to disregard.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago

I didn't come seek out this community or this post, it got it's way to me. Here is a downvote for you as well.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Day 1 of downvoting every ai image I see.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's proportion integral derivative control of some functionality. Fans can use it.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Haha, private company, you can't do shit about it.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The weird thing is that in this scenario these panels are still applicable for replacement probably because the the solar panels of today compared to then are about ~40% more efficient. So compared to a new replacement it's at around 60% efficiency. A major site plans profit off of 30 years and plans to replace glass at that time, so while it may still be somewhat useful long term it's probably more profitable to replace them.

view more: next ›