Shatur

joined 4 years ago
[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I recently read an interesting comment about .ml that I think is worth sharing: https://lemmy.ml/post/42725005/23793647

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Secondly you’ve not provided any proof that Zelensky is a “gangster”

I think Cowbee said "Kiev is a gangster state with immense corruption" which is a bit different.

For almost 2 years, people have been violently kidnapped from the streets, thanks to this totally non-gangster state, after they loosened the laws (which Zelensky signed, BTW). For example, here (violence warning!) is a yesterday video from Odessa. And we get video like this every day. It's like ICE in US, but much worse because people can't protest against it due to ongoing war.

And recently we had a ton of corruption scandals tied to Zelensky's inner circle. You can just scroll below, someone already linked.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

but it isn’t a “hardcode”

But you showed a constant with the words. Even if you can disable this, I'd call it a "hardcoded list".

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

It now has workspaces (it's called servers in Discord) and there you can have chats, which are basically channels like in Discord.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Lemmy devs? I'd suggest to read what they actually write. They are good guys.

I also don't think it matters. For example, I don't really like the behavior of the Duckstation dev. It's a PS1 emulator. But I don't have to agree with him in order to use it.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's a shame to see that people think of Lemmy creators as some sort of villains.

I created my account on .ml before the Reddit blackout, but there wasn't much content there, so I didn't use it much. I properly started using it after the "Reddit blackout," and that's when I learned about the so-called "tankie problem." I've met people with weird opinions, but the developers and Marxists in general aren't bad people. People just usually make a strawmen to argue against.

Anyway, none of their opinions are reflected in the software. Lemmy is done in a truly democratic and user-oriented way, and I respect them for it.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not sure about the better UX. Take a look at the recent code analysis: https://lemmy.ml/post/42415919/23662293

I think the current behavior is very confusing. Unless you're an instance admin, you don't know whether these features are enabled or not.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Maybe add Matrix as a Discord alternative?

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think what the commenter above is trying to say is that they are getting tired of seeing Lemmy users pointing fingers at each other. Most of us are clearly passionate about FOSS and hate capitalism. Otherwise, why would we have joined Lemmy?

All these "tankies" and "libs" have lost all meaning. Many times, I've seen people simply make up shit from both sides about what libs/tankies think, and then just make fun of it. It's not productive.

I'm not talking about you. I think your replies are very reasonable. But I think I can relate to the commenter's feelings.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, makes sense!

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The quoted comment is for a different post: https://lemmy.ml/post/42339089/23675448

So I was surprised to see it being mentioned here.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

This is some LLM-level of analysis right there (Lemmygrad.ml and hexbear.net are blocked from many instances, and people often lump lemmy.ml together into a triad, hence lemmy.ml must be automatically blocked as well!).

I'm the author of the comment you quoted, and even though you didn't reply to me, I'd like to say that I assumed so because of this.

Edit: I was wrong about this, here is the default defederation list. For those who interested in what the linked part does, see https://lemmy.ml/post/42415919/23664761.

Lemmy users be like “why can’t we all get along…”, yet feel absolutely free to criticize every tiny aspect

I disagree with the previous commenter attitude. But personally I don't think it's bad to discuss things we don't like if the discussion is healthy.

ignoring how e.g. lemmy.ml kicks people out of communities

Who is ignoring it? I think it was widely discussed on the Fediverse.

39
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Shatur@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

Backstory

I have quite an old LCD monitor and wanted to buy a new one for quite some time. But I was planning to travel and wouldn't be able to bring the monitor with me. Then a friend of mine shared an article with an intriguing title: I ditched my laptop for a pocketable mini PC and a pair of AR glasses.

I had never heard of AR glasses before. Turns out they're basically a "dumb" monitor with a USB‑C connection, but the image is projected into your eyes, so it looks like it's floating. No additional software is required, and I can take it anywhere with me. So I decided to order one. The same friend later asked me for a review, but I decided to post it here and just share the link - maybe someone else will also find it useful.

Impressions

I went for the Xreal One. They are quite pricy, but I wanted to try something cutting-edge. There's also a Pro version, but according to this review on Reddit and this review on YouTube, it has several drawbacks - mainly reduced sharpness, which is important for coding.

The glasses aren't as comfortable as regular sunglasses — they're a little bit heavier, but I got used to them. They also generate quite a bit of heat on the top part of the frame. It can cause slight discomfort when it touches face, but I've gotten used to wearing them properly to avoid that. I can wear them for quite a long time, but I wouldn't use them for 100% of my screen time.

They have three levels of electrochromatic dimming (the lenses physically get darker). On the lowest setting (disabled), it's not fully transparent — more like a sunglasses with a slight dimming. At the maximum level, it's extremely dark; even in a well‑lit room I can't see what's on the edges. With dimming disabled, it looks the coolest — like an actual floating screen with a bit of transparency. But the darkening is useful for a more immersive experience since it removes that transparency. They also have "Auto transparency" option that automatically disables dimming when you turn your head away from the screen. Also, the brighter the room is, the more noticeable the reflection on the bottom of the glasses due to the lens's prism design. It's not an issue with the Pro version, but I didn't find it distracting at all, even in a well-lit room.

The screen is great. From video reviews, I was a bit worried that the colors would look like from a projector, but it's just impossible to capture this properly on camera. In reality, the colors are nice. They also allow you to configure the color temperature, and I found the coldest setting the most comfortable. The picture isn't very sharp — there's a bit of motion blur when I move my head around, and thin red or pink text on a black background looks slightly off. I think it's a limitation of the technology, plus the screen is only 1080p. But it's not as bad as it sounds — I can still use it comfortably for coding.

By default, the screen is 16:9 with 120Hz, but you can switch to 32:9 or 21:9 with 60Hz. I use 16:9 for gaming and 32:9 for productivity — 32:9 is so large, it's like two monitors glued together. I usually keep my browser on one side and something else on the other. I also love playing retro games, and I can say that 4:3 content looks great. Since the screen is OLED, the black pixels don't emit any light, so the letterboxes fully transparent.

However, it's not the same as having an actual ultra‑wide monitor. The screen doesn't fill the entire surface of the glasses — that's what the FOV is about. On my model, it's 50 degrees, which is quite large. But in ultra‑wide mode, I still have to rotate my head to see the other half of the screen. So there's no peripheral vision like there would be on an actual ultra‑wide monitor. Also, other people can't see what you're seeing, even if they're close — which can be both a good and a bad thing.

You can also configure how far the screen appears — anywhere from 1m to 10m — and its size in inches. There are five size levels, and the values depend on the selected distance and whether ultra‑wide mode is enabled. I usually use 1m for productivity and 4m for gaming and multimedia. My preferred size is the "middle" (third) level, which is designed to fit the entire screen without me needing to rotate my head (except when ultra‑wide mode is enabled). For 1m these sizes are 35″ for 16:9 and 64″ for 32:9; at 4m they're 140″ and 255″ respectively. The large screen feels very immersive — it's like being in a cinema.

The glasses also have three view modes:

  • Anchor. I can rotate my head freely and The screen stays fixed in space. However, if I walk around, the screen moves with me (which is what 3 DoF means). This is the mode I use most of the time.
  • Follow. The screen rotates along with your head. I don't use this mode much.
  • Side view. Similar to Follow, but the screen is positioned in the corner. I use it when I'm doing chores and want to watch something. They also have a stabilizer enabled by default, which smooths the screen movement when you move your head.

To use the glasses, you need a USB‑C video output. My motherboard supports it, but to enable it I had to connect my video card to the motherboard via DisplayPort. I never heard about a connection like this before, but it's from my motherboard manual. It does make sense, though — the GPU provides the video output, and the motherboard wouldn't know about it otherwise. Software‑wise, it works out of the box with my KDE Plasma setup on Arch Linux. The only issue I'm noticing is some small visual glitches for the first few seconds after connecting. On PC I use it together with my regular monitor. The mentioned "Auto transparency" pairs nicely with it. However, it's not perfect, since I'm still looking at the second screen through what's basically a pair of light sunglasses. So I usually don't put anything important on it.

As for phones, neither mine nor my wife's supports video output. But from reviews, I think it wouldn't be very convenient to use with a phone anyway. First, the phone's screen has to stay on, otherwise the glasses won't display anything. Second, you can't interact with the phone through the glasses, so you have to look at the phone itself.

But I found a great option to use the glasses with. I have a Retroid Pocket Flip 2 — a pocketable retro console that runs Android and supports video output. Unlike a regular phone, it automatically turns off its built‑in display when a second screen is connected. It also has physical controls, so I don't need to use a touchscreen. The Android UI isn't perfect for a gamepad, but it works. Streaming to it also works great because, even though the screen is disabled, the touch input still works — so it basically becomes a touchpad. Since the device is a clamshell, I sometimes use an 8BitDo Micro as an input device to avoid opening it, which is especially convenient for quickly pausing videos. This gamepad can also act as a keyboard via a special switch on it, so it works nicely when I stream from my PC too.

I also have a Steam Deck, but there's not much to add — it just works without any issue.

The glasses also have built-in speakers. I like their design: you don't put anything inside your ears — the speakers are integrated into the frame near where your ears are, so they kind of "whisper" to you. Others can hear them only at high volume. This affects the sound quality, so music doesn't sound as good as on quality headphones, but I think it's a worthy compromise. And it's still possible to wear regular headphones with the glasses.

They also have a shortcut button on the frame. I assigned screen off on regular press and ultra-wide mode on hold.

The firmware is proprietary, but it doesn't use the internet. And what I liked is that updates are installed through a web browser. However, it has to be a Chromium‑based browser on Windows or Mac. Luckily, I have a dual‑boot, so I rebooted to update the firmware. The update added support for 16:9, so it looks like it's not just for bug fixes.

The glasses can be equipped with prescription lenses, but I wear contact lenses and those work as well.

They also have a camera add‑on called Xreal Eye. It's a small camera that unlocks 6 DoF tracking and can also take photos and record videos. The media is stored directly on the glasses, which have 2GB of space, and can later be transferred to a phone or PC over a cable. I haven't bought it yet, but I'm considering it since I'm interested in having 6 DoF.

Conclusion

I love these glasses, it's easily my favorite portable option. It's a huge screen I can take anywhere with me and put where I want. I don't mind that it's only 1080p, none of my portable devices can fully handle 4k anyway.

Since they are better then my current monitor, I use them with my PC too. But I don't think it's a proper replacement. If you don't need portability, regular screen will be better and cheaper.

 

My wife is looking for a portable device primarily for modeling in Blender and optionally for drawing in Krita. So we looking for something with a GNU/Linux support from manufacturer.

We considered https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/TUXEDO-InfinityFlex-14-Gen1, it looks nice, but maybe you have other suggestions? Do you have experience with convertibles, how convenient is to draw on them?

We also considered https://earth.starlabs.systems/pages/starlite for drawing and a separate device for Blender, but having two devices might not be convenient...

 

I searching for a tablet for drawing and discovered this one. Anyone tried drawing on it? I wondering if the experience is good.

On the page they doesn't mention if the screen supports drawing pens, but it's possible to order an MPP pen with it, so I assume that it works with Wacom or Surface pens?

164
Linux Running on an NES? (www.youtube.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Shatur@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

The author managed to run LUnix on an NES without tricks, like embedding a Raspberry Pi into the cartridge.

 

Today discovered this mod and wanted to share. I think that idea is so cool!

Originally found it by watching this video.

 

I was shocked that Rockstar was caught using cracks in off-releases (!!!), then they tried to "crack" themselves, ran into their own anti-piracy measures and left it like that! The game is unplayable.

It's funny that the pirates didn't face any of these measures and cracked the game correctly.

view more: next ›