I only include it because pretty much every guide on zfs setups recommends disabling it these days. I don't believe it's anything I've every had to use despite several drive crashes over the years.
Shdwdrgn
I think this is the only change I've made that affects my history... It simply ignores multiple copies of a command when you repeat it multiple times, making it easier to up-arrow through the unique things I've executed.
export HISTCONTROL=ignoredups
Nothing wrong with used servers, that's the only thing I've ever run. Ebay has provided a ton of equipment to me.
I've never used TrueNAS, but my experience with ZFS is that it could care less what order the drives are detected by the operating system. You could always shut down the machine, swap two drives around, boot back up, and see if the pool comes back online. If it fails, shut it back down and put the drives in their original locations.
If you are moving your data to new (larger) drives, before anything else you should take the opportunity to play with the new drives and find the ZFS settings that work well. I think recordsize is autodetected these days, but maybe for your use things like dedup, atime, and relatime can be turned off, and do you need xattr? If you're using 4096 block sizes did you partition the drives starting at sector 2048? Did you turn off compression if you don't need it? Also consider your hardware, like if you have multiple connection ports, can you get a speed increase by spreading out the drives so you don't saturate any particular channel?
Newer hardware by itself can make a huge difference too. My last upgrade took me from PCIe x4 to x16 slots, allowing me to upgrade to SAS3 cards, and overall went from around 70MB/s to 460MB/s transfer speeds with enough hardware to manage up to 40 drives. Turns out the new configuration also uses much less power, so a big win all around.
"We managed to not kill the first subject, but we're hopeful to succeed in the future"...
Damn, it was still running? Not that I still remember my username or password, but damn...
I have an MFC-9340 and have also run into this problem. The drivers available in cups allow me to either print two-sided in b&w, or print single-sided in color (at least for the drivers that work at all with the printer). I finally broke down and installed the binary from Brother to get it working fully, but it's annoying that I can't just use a generic driver with this printer.
A lot will depend on your preferred workflow, and since you mentioned SolidWorks I assume that means you prefer a more GUI-oriented approach. However as an alternative, if you are comfortable with more of a programming approach, you might look in to OpenSCAD. Most things are done from a more primitive standpoint in how you create each part of an object, but I like having the direct control over every aspect.
You mean like "innovating" faster connections speeds that they've been withholding from us for decades, but can suddenly flip a switch and advertise faster speeds when another provider competes with them? Yeah, I wouldn't know anything about that... ;-)
“heavy-handed regulation will not just hobble network investment and innovation, it will also seriously jeopardize our nation’s collective efforts to build and sustain reliable broadband in rural and unserved communities”
They said exactly the same thing when the first net neutrality laws were getting put in place, then after the laws went into effect the companies went on to invest record amounts in innovation and infrastructure. Funny how their words are completely meaningless.
I do actually agree with that, these lengths of times are pretty ridiculous.
Heh sorry about that. There's also a zfs conversation going on where I had suggested disabling the 'dedup' option. I've never heard of dedupe being used in the context of the shell history, so yeah, I got confused.