Oh it gets even worse than that... When I read about this on Monday they were saying that the call advised people to "save" their votes and use them when they really mattered in November. Now who the hell is stupid enough to believe that you can't vote in the general election if you also voted in the primary?
Shdwdrgn
joined 1 year ago
Sounds like a company that shouldn't be trusted if they're getting hacked that easily?
I was actually just googling for disabling the address bar select-all and this came up near the top. Big surprise, there's a lot of people that really hate this ~~bug~~ feature.
Are you referring to actual phone calls? I mean everyone should know by now that phone numbers can be easily spoofed, we see that in every call claiming we need a new credit card or car insurance. The easiest way to see if a call is a scam is to force them to go off-script. Like when they start asking for personal info like your SSN... you called me, why don't YOU know my information? Of course they'll say they need it to verify who I am, and I'll just tell them that they should already know who I am since they called me. Another big tell is if they want more than just the last four of your SSN... absolutely no legitimate agency will ask for the entire thing over the phone.
I guess it just depends on how much free time you have, but sometimes I just like messing with these people to waste their time. Some will get downright angry when they realize you have no intention of falling for their scam, but mostly they just hang up.
They're really not. I got one just this morning, your credit has been placed on hold for your AmEx card, log in to update your info... Yeah ok I don't have any credit cards, and besides why is a pet boarding domain sending me AmEx emails? If you can't spot something that obvious then you really don't deserve to have a bank account.
Hey I might have found something... Doesn't look like there's been an update in awhile but appears to have been working at least through FF102. https://github.com/SebastianSimon/firefox-omni-tweaks
I'll have to give it a try later tonight.
OK so I did remember correctly. I was using version 60-something before that and wasn't sure exactly when it changed. Unfortunately I haven't seen anyone else on the internet find a way to fix this problem. And there were a lot of really pissed off posters in the bug thread asking why if they went out of their way to add code to break this function, why couldn't they have also taken another five seconds to give us a config setting to disable it.
I found it annoying when FF no longer showed the http part of an address, but since nearly everything is on https these days it very rarely bounces back and forth for me any more.
So it's ok that it works for your use-case and screw consistency? My point is that if you say it's ok for one application to do things their own way, it basically invites every other app developer to ignore the standards and just do whatever they want. And no, single-click selecting the entire URL shouldn't be considered a standard, it's just something that changed in the last few years when one browser made the call and everyone else played follow-the-leader.
By the way, you mentioned that "all" of your browsers behave the same way . I'd like to remind you that Chrome, Chromium, and Safari all use the same engine so they're basically the same thing. I think Opera stands alone but I don't have that installed here so I can't check it immediately. I'd ask if anyone had checked Exploder, but who in their right mind uses that except for work-related stuff where their developers can't write HTML, and Microsoft is probably the ones who started this mess anything since they're well know for ignoring standards. That really only leaves four unique browsers though. Not saying you didn't consider this already, I just wanted to point it out in case you hadn't.
If you want an example similar to an address bar, how about the current path in any file manager -- I have Caja, Dolphin, and something called PCManFM here (not sure where that came from)? Once again, a single click does not select the entire path, it just places the cursor exactly where you clicked and nothing is selected. I can't think of any other types of applications where you have some kind of a navigation bar, but that's the closest example I know.
It certainly helps, that was already mentioned by someone else and wasn't an option I was aware of.
Maybe because it WAS consistent until the FF devs made the choice to change it? As I said before, if they decided to change the role of the right-click to no longer bring up a context menu, would you be ok with that as well? What about the difference between clicking on text in a browser article or clicking into a textarea? Those also have different roles, so if the devs decide that a user single-clicking into the textarea should automatically select the entire field, would that make sense to you? If I click on any text anywhere in any application, I expect to get the same results, and not have to remember how every application handles that click differently. Sure if I was clicking on something other than text then different actions might make sense in different applications, but the idea of a single click on the address bar selecting everything is akin to clicking an icon on my desktop and having all the surrounding icons also getting selected -- it just doesn't make sense and it's not consistent with a single click in any other application.
You didn't mention if this is a HDD or an SDD. If it's a HDD, you will never even reach SATA 2 speeds, although you should be able to saturate SATA 1. Realistically you might be able to push around 200MB/s on newer HDDs but that's assuming nothing else gets in your way.