I have heard someone say in all seriousness that it's still murder to abort an ectopic pregnancy (which would just kill the mom and 'child' if allowed to continue)...
Silentiea
joined 1 year ago
In star Trek, they use sonic showers.
"don't feed the trolls," they said, but did she ever listen?
No, I guess I didn't...
But the point is that you don't use it to make the campaign or write the book. You use it as a tool to help yourself make a campaign or write a book. Ignoring the potential of ai as a tool is silly just because it can't do the whole job for you. That would be a bit like saying you are a fool for using a sponge when washing because it will never get everything by itself...
Happens to all of us from time to time.
I was with it until it said let's train AI robots to kill people, and then use them to track every face on the planet and use that data to "identify threats"...
OP wants a robot overseer, but also wants it to be a police state.
Train it to learn how to use it's limbs and eyes to climb over obstacles, open doors and detain or kill people. We could replace police with them. Super agile robot cops with no racial bias or other prejudices. Arresting people and recording their crimes. Genuine benefit.
I got as far as ai cops and became sceptical. Like, yeah, sure, but what you're describing isn't just a robot being controlled by an AI, it's also the ai making decisions and choosing who to pursue and such, which is a known weakness right now.
And then you let them kill people.
Exactly. It can generate those base-level ideas much faster and worth higher fidelity than humans can without it, and that can see us at the hobby level with DND, or up at the business level with writers rooms and such.
The important point is that you still need someone good at making the thing you want to look at and finish the thing you're making, or you end up with paintings with too many fingers or stories full of contradictions
This, tbh.
Let's get a ubi or something going
Trouble is the best way to regulate it isn't clear. If the new tool can do the job at least as well and cheaper, just disallowing it is less beneficial to society. You can tax its use until it is only a little cheaper, but then you have to get people to approve of taxes. Et cetera
As long as everything gets thrown it's still brute force, but the reason they use ai for it is because it can throw a lot more a lot faster.
You heard OP, remove the question if it's allowed! Only banned questions may stay! Does the set of all sets that don't contain themselves contain itself!?