SineNomineAnonymous

joined 3 years ago
[–] SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

to be fair to the incompetent people in law enforcement, I do believe "trying to kill a presidential candidate slated to win and being a millimeter away from getting it done" would justify relying on a 0-day.

[–] SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

"We tried 0000. Tony, write up a press release about how incredible we are at our job and how we spent 400% of our usual overtime on it and send it to the tech press. Make sure they mention we need to triple next year's budget for security and shit."

[–] SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Exactly. The article doesn't shy away from a bit of free publicity for Cellerite. Which is nowhere near as much of a magic bullet as the "tech media" makes it out to be.

How do I know it? By doing the most basic of research by heading to their website and looking at their manuals and documentation.

And Cellerite won't tell you this publicly because their bottom line depends on their ability to massively overprice their services which they sell to technically illiterate people.

Any article that mentions Cellerite without a caveat about the dubiousness of their publicity can be disregarded and shouldn't be taken seriously.

[–] SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

Long time FF user, things really aren't looking good for Mozilla as a whole.