Skates

A group of Alabama residents decide to rob a bank. They put on their ski masks, grab their guns, run in, yell for everyone to get down and they start looking for the vault. They ransack every office, but all they find are some fancy coolers. Tired from the search and hot from wearing ski masks in Alabama, they open one of them up to find a bunch of cool refreshing yogurt. They drink it, cool off a bit, and then they go looking for the manager. They find this nice looking guy in a suit and tie:

"Hey, are you the manager of this bank?", they yell, pointing a gun at his face.

"Yes sir, I am", the guy is shaking and scared, but tries to keep calm.

"Take us to your vault, right fucking now!"

"Vault? Sir this is a sperm bank"

Why cook them? Eat them alive.

So basically people are betting that they will be able sell the stock right after Feb 22 before it loses more than $0.50?

Not necessarily. With all it gained, they can even sell tomorrow. Or at any point before it takes the next massive hit.

I work on crap like this, and it depends. Yeah, diagnostics are done in the car - the main ones, that is. But for example BMW collects data from all their cars - they're able to do some big data analysis. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the diagnostic info this app provided is an inference - your car has software version 4.3.21, and all cars on that sw version have experienced a certain bug at 200k km, so it's time to go to the dealership or get a remote update or something. It could be done.

Most likely though, they're just taking the personal data from your car and showing it to you. You know - after also saving it for themselves.

my only point is that it will be a toy, or for niche applications.

Your only point is the same point people with no idea of how things work have been making since forever. "It's just a fad". This was claimed about cars, about the internet, about computers, about videogames... Literally anyone who's out of touch with reality and resents their lack of creativity or ability to think of a use for a groundbreaking technology positions themselves this way. It's not new, and maybe it's sometimes worth debating, but not when you follow it up with something like this:

this isnt going to be a an ipad-level device.

The iPad? Really? That's your idea of a gamechanger? If you think ipads are anything except "a toy" and "for niche applications", you're living your wildest years, my dude.

Does the data explain why women don't go into stem, or does it simply state what women in stem self-report?

Don't go into stem, you can't read data. And I say that while honestly not caring about your genitals.

To be honest, if Microsoft didn't give a shit about anti-trust laws and if they just let Apple die instead of investing in them, we wouldn't have Apple today. Which - to be clear: would be a great thing.

Maybe we should actually all strive to be more monopoly-oriented, the laws be damned.

These are Apple's devices

But that's the thing - they aren't. Not once they're bought. At that point, they're my device, or your device.

Surely you can see how having a single supplier can be a bad thing, right? That supplier has no incentive to deliver quality. Why would they?

If you want to start baking cookies and sell them, you need to beat several bakers in your town and several companies in the rest of the country if you ever want to be successful and profitable. This is because there are already several well-established suppliers who have proven they make great cookies - why would anyone buy from you?

On the other hand if you're the only one selling - you can reduce cocoa content in half to save costs, you can replace quality ingredients with cheaper versions for the same reason, you can increase prices as much as you want - the cookie-seeking customer will still buy, because there are no other options.

Sure, you can also be the best baker in the world. You can put love and care into every cookie that leaves your shop. You can care about customers and make sure they get the best stuff, because you have a monopoly and you can enforce that view.

But in reality, what actually happens is that those decisions don't belong to you. They belong to the soulless company that only has one purpose: maximize profits. And you can be the best person ever, but if you're working for a publicly traded company you're at the mercy of shareholders.

Why would you want this? Forget about apple, why would you want this in any field?

It is.

Personally, I'm not against it. Acting means by default imitating something. Pretending you are something you are not. If AI can do it as well or better than actors, I'm okay with that.

Maybe we're at a stage where the voice actors of tomorrow will be simply those who can configure the AI to output the voice most fitting the role, rather than those who can reproduce it with their own vocal chords. They're different skillets - I see no reason why one should be more important and worth saving than the other.

This is progress. The only bad thing about progress is that it won't benefit the many, but the few that can capitalize on it. This, I do regret. But on the other hand - I'm sure all the horse ranchers were very much against cars when they first appeared, and not for environmental reasons, but for more selfish ones. And while it might've been sad for so many of them to have to start working in a different field, it's also undeniable that cars have made a huge economic impact on the world and that living conditions as a whole have improved since their invention.

Idk. It's a whole thing. I really hope these people can find a way to ride the wave. Because right now it looks like they'll just be crushed by it instead, and I for one can't justify impeding progress for the love of the few people stuck in the past.

Compared to anything nowadays, yes - Oblivion was awful. But let me tell you, I played that game as a kid and it wouldn't have been even half as interesting with no VA. When you're a stealth archer and someone gets close to you and you think you're safely hidden, but then you hear "you're not supposed to be here", it scared the hell out of 15-yo me and made me run away sooo fast. I tried morrowind just after that and couldn't stomach playing it - no VA? At all? It was awful.

Maybe we sometimes forget, games are also for kids. Kids don't need the best acting. And while adult me can't take oblivion VA seriously - it is still one of the best games I've ever played as a child, while Morrowind never even made it into the list because I was spoiled by playing Oblivion first, with its VA, bad as it is.

Well, indie studios aren't known for huge budgets - they generally don't include voice acting at all. Between no voice acting and AI voice acting, which is better?

I normally advocate for piracy. In cases like these, where some corpo comes in and STEALS from their customers (because let's stop pretending this is anything else) I advocate for the other type of piracy, with sabers, cannons, rape, theft, pillaging and making some of these assholes walk a plank.