SkyeStarfall

Of course it's assuming that's how advanced propulsion tech works. But it is useful to try to detect, just in case that's how it actually turns out to work, no?

And if we detect something interesting, like a potential warp bubble collapse, well, that also gives us a strong hint that it's possible, helping us to direct research in the right path.

Detecting techno-signatures of aliens would be super useful for us.

That it doesn't have an unlocked frame rate should be unacceptable tbh. High refresh rate monitors are common and cheap these days.

It can be useful in explaining concepts you're unsure about, in regards to the reading part, but you should always verify that information.

But it has helped me understand certain concepts in the past, where I struggled with finding good explanations using a search engine.

To be fair, you need a license to drive cars

But wouldn't the husband be at fault here either way by conservative standards? It's infidelity.

Which makes the difference between the AIs and humans lower, likely increasing the significance of the result.

If you read into the study, they also include the pass rates for humans. It's higher than AIs, but still less than 75%

While I agree it's a relatively low percentage, not being sure and having people pick effectively randomly is still an interesting result.

The alternative would be for them to never say that gpt-4 is a human, not 50% of the time.

And at the same time believe in a million conspiracy theories in fields that they definitively are not experts in

Solar panels have also been used in space mission for a very long time. The first solar powered probe was Vanguard 1 in 1958

How many times do people need to get fucked over by privatized black box software before they realize that FOSS has a point?

Because you clearly do not have any technical understanding of the field, or what machine learning even is, or how it can be useful, and the dozen of different things also called AI.