SkyeStarfall

But if the true costs were quantized in the formula and not just externalized maybe it would suddenly make more sense. After all, in the end, society pays for it no matter what.

Then people will argue capitalism incentivizes innovation.

Frankly, if just 0.3% of buyers return an IT product (especially a novel one) because they "don't get it", that's a massive success in my book. Have you seen users?

Society rewards people for making bad choices and doing bad things and many still pretend the system "works"

This AI won't hallucinate because it's not an LLM

LLMs are not the only form of AI, or machine learning.

Probably to produce new nodes. You can't just reuse old equipment.

Sure, but how many "easily changed things" do you need for the camel's back to break?

I feel like I constantly hear of tiny little things that get worse in windows. Sure, maybe each individually is not a big deal, but it all is just forever added on, constantly creating a slightly worse user experience.

In the end, windows is not follow a very user-friendly/user-centric design.

Yeah, I didn't agree to shit. I got yanked from the void into all of this.

Except physically speaking, that warmth from the motor is still just from the energy the wind has.. energy that would get transformed to heat from friction eventually anyway. It's just that this way we get useful work for our own purposes in the form of electricity.

Who cares though. It's a fur suit. It's basically identical to a mascot costume.

Most don't need faster internet than 50mbits/s either, doesn't mean you won't like having it. A more reliable and faster wi-fi is always welcome.