Copied from Reddit's /r/cscareerquestions:
The US Department of Labor is proposing a rule change that would add STEM occupations to their list of Schedule A occupations. Schedule A occupations are pre-certified and thus employers do NOT have to prove that they first sought American workers for a green card job. This comes on the heels of massive layoffs from the very people pushing this rule change.
From Tech Target:
The proposed exemption could be applied to a broad range of tech occupations including, notably, software engineering -- which represents about 1.8 million U.S. positions, according to U.S. labor statistics data -- and would allow companies to bypass some labor market tests if there's a demonstrated shortage of U.S. workers in an occupation.
Currently the comments include heavy support from libertarian think tank, Cato, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association
The San Francisco Tech scene has been riddled with CEOs whining over labor shortages for the past few months on Twitter/X amidst a sea of layoffs from Amazon, Meta, Google, Tesla, and much more. Now, we know that it's an attempt at influencing the narrative for these rule changes.
If you are having a hard time finding a job, now, this rule change will only make things worse.
From the US Census Bureau:
Does majoring in STEM Lead to a STEM job after graduation?
The vast majority (62%) of college-educated workers who majored in a STEM field were employed in non-STEM fields such as non-STEM management, law, education, social work, accounting or counseling. In addition, 10% of STEM college graduates worked in STEM-related occupations such as health care.
The path to STEM jobs for non-STEM majors was narrow. Only a few STEM-related majors (7%) and non-STEM majors (6%) ultimately ended up in STEM occupations.
If you or someone you know has experienced difficulty finding an engineering job post graduation amidst this so called shortage, then please submit your story in the remaining few days that the Public comment period is still open (ends May 13th.)
Public comment can be made, here:
https://www.regulations.gov/document/ETA-2023-0006-0001/comment
Please share this with anyone else you feel has will be affected by this rule change.
Man you gotta stop making assumptions about other people.
I have numerous computers and only one of them has Windows on it, and even that one is set up to dualboot with Linux. I live and breathe Linux daily, friend.
I live and breathe Linux so much that I set it up so that I don't have to touch my phone, because I fucking hate phones. I guarantee you I spend way more time on the PC than on a phone.
I have network-level blocking to prevent a massive amount of data entering or leaving my phone and PC.
I'm a Linux user by default, and I think what Microsoft is doing is anti-consumer so I don't really give a shit if they make money off it or not.
Taking a financial loss because you fucked over your customers is how capitalism is supposed to work. All this talk of entitlement forgets that I paid for my fucking OS. It doesn't matter if the OS isn't their moneymaker: if it isn't that's more reason for them to stop fucking their customers for a quick buck.
Also, finally, if Microsoft really cared about their OS and licensing, maybe they should have updated how their licensing activation works at some point in the last 20 years so the massgrave exploit would stop working.