Steve

joined 2 years ago
[–] Steve@communick.news 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That assumes you were entitled to something that nobody owed you.

If the money was never yours, can you say it was stolen from you?

[–] Steve@communick.news 20 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Being an idiot in a hurry, I saw the medication Warfarin

[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look for Signage Displays. They're basically TVs with different software.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It sounds like you're thinking there is no way to compete with Reddit. If you charge, people will use Reddit. If you have ads, people will use Reddit. People are only here because there aren't ads and it's free?

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If you charge, you also have to offer a better experience than the free options. There's no reason instances can't use ads for people unwilling or unable to pay. For me I'll gladly pay for an ad-free experience.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not really how it works. If it was made to work that way, it would still be a relatively small group donating their own compute resources to subsidize everyone else. Which is what we already have, and isn't very scalable.

[–] Steve@communick.news 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (22 children)

The only real option is to charge people.
Hosting isn't free. It costs money to run a website. That money needs to come from somewhere. If it doesn't come from advertisers, it must come from users.

There could be a verity options for that. But I like the simple annual subscription. Each and every user pays. Spread out the cost as much as possible. It's only fair.

[–] Steve@communick.news 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Of course if one truly can't afford it, paying for search can seem a luxury.

However I would argue as a counterpoint; If there's any online service one would consider paying for, it should be search. Search is most literally our "front page to the internet". It's our first stop in any quest for information. Even the founders of Google knew early on, that putting adds in search creates a perverse incentive against the best results, favoring instead worse results, so people perform more searches, creating more opportunities to show people adds.

$5 a month isn't much to know your query will give the results you want, instead of the results advertisers want.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Haven't been able to find a copy of Big Shark by Tommy Wiseau.

[–] Steve@communick.news 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean Reddit the company, or the Reddit the community?

I think the answers are "No", and "A little. It often gets deleted when mentioned."

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago

I am familiar, and I'm still wondering that.
Seemed kind of obviously inevitable to me

[–] Steve@communick.news 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Part of me hates myself for asking this. You clearly put a lot of effort into this.

Why? There are at least a couple actual blogging options with ActivityPub support. Why try to force Lemmy into something it isn't.

 

Kagi AI summery:
Cards Against Humanity (CAH) is suing SpaceX for allegedly taking over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that CAH purchased in 2017 to prevent the construction of Trump's border wall. CAH claims it maintained the land but SpaceX later moved construction equipment and materials onto the property without permission. The lawsuit seeks up to $15 million in damages to restore the land and cover losses, and also requests punitive damages. CAH says SpaceX never asked for permission to use the property and never apologized for the damage. The lawsuit includes before and after photos purporting to show SpaceX's use of the land.

And CAH's website all about it

view more: next β€Ί