TAG

joined 1 year ago
[–] TAG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

If they have a great meta-search algorithm, users would be able to search without an account and see how great the results are. Then, when a user wants to personalize ranking and block sites, they can create an account.

I always assumed that they make you create an account to track search usage and cut you off once you hit the free tier limit.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Uncharted and Last of Us are first party Sony games. If they were to say that a game can still be enjoyable without cutting edge graphics no one would want to buy the latest PlayStation iteration.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Are there any good lists of known AI user agents? Ideally in a dependency repo so my server can get the latest values when the list is updated.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

It would be a nice gesture, but I will believe those promises of support when they have teeth to them.

What happens if they stop doing it? Do I have to sue them for breach of contract, have to prove actual damages, and settle the class action lawsuit for $5 in store credit?

What happens if the company goes bankrupt or creates a new subsidiary to service the product and the subsidiary folds?

What level of support are they obligated to provide? What issues must be fixed and how promptly?

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I would assume some of that is acqui-hiring. Google acquires a company and looks at which employees are the outstanding talent. The best employees are poached for projects Google cares about while the rest are left to keep the product going without the thought leaders who built it.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

If WB really wanted to tank their game division, they would do what they did with movies and start cancelling almost finished projects for a tax write off

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I feel like there is some context to this meme that I am missing.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I would go a step further and say that it should not be a stock purchase but partial nationalization. The government is not getting shares that will be sold later. The government is getting a right to appoint part of the board of directors. Every time the company issues a dividend, buys back stock, or engages in other activities to return value back to the shareholders, a proportional amount of money must be paid to the treasury. It only makes sense that if a company is so big that its failure is going to hurt society as a whole, it should be owned by society.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That is why they make you lease the battery. You cannot swap out your old battery, just the battery you are leasing. Your lease payments include the cost of them replacing batteries.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The model only works if users are forced to subscribe to a battery swapping service for the full life of the vehicle (or there is a large upfront fee to join with a used vehicle). Otherwise it would be too easy for a consumer with a worn out battery to do a one-time swap and get a like-new battery as a cheap alternative to very costly battery repairs. The dumped battery is likely to have very poor range and the battery swap company will need to dispose of it.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

The problem is not even big trucks. It is medium speed collisions with barriers. Kei trucks typically don't have air bags or a crumple zone. They are designed for low speed driving on open roads.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (5 children)

But that only works for untrusted code escaping a sandbox, right? It does not help with malicious code embedded into legitimate seeming apps. The later vector seems easier, especially on Android, no?

view more: next ›