Th4tGuyII

at the end of the day my right shoulder smells of women's perfume

That's gotta count for something right?

If you have to ask this question, you know it doesn't count.

Also, I think you'd be better trying to flirt with the Salsa ladies than sniffing for their perfume on your shoulder

It's a race to the bed, as everybody knows monsters can't invade your bed, that's why so many of them live under it

And that is why you should always test newfound superpowers on a small scale before blowing your load on freezing time for 6 months you depraved Anon

The goals of the war being?...

Oh right, the destruction of every non-Israeli living in Gaza.

• Why else would they go after Hospitals treating innocent Palestinian victims?

• Why else would they spend months and months denying any and all foreign aid to Gaza after cutting them off from all food, water, and electricity?

• Why else would they airstrike clearly marked aid convoys for Gaza going along a pre-agreed route?

• Why else would members of the IDF record thselves killing innocent Palestinians?

• Why else would they oppose any and all peace deals, and openly plot to betray any and all ceasefires?

Israel has killed more than 30,000 innocent people. You can't just call that collateral or even callous disregard, it's mass murder, a genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

Hamas are not good guys by any stretch, but if you're being morally high-grounded by a terrorist organisation, then you ought to know which side of history you're on.

Edit: Israeli not Israelite

At the time I got my current system, I did 1tb SSD for the main, and a 4tb HDD for data drive.

For my next system, I think I'll split that a bit more evenly, as most of my games end up on the HDD which means they a bit to load

So providing a fine-tuned model shouldn't either.

I didn't mean in terms of providing. I meant that if someone provided a base model, someone took that, built upon it, then used it for a harmful purpose - of course the person modified it should be liable, not the base provider.

It's like if someone took a version of Linux, modified it, then used that modified version for an illegal act - you wouldn't go after the person who made the unmodified version.

SB 1047 is a California state bill that would make large AI model providers – such as Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Mistral – liable for the potentially catastrophic dangers of their AI systems.

Now this sounds like a complicated debate - but it seems to me like everyone against this bill are people who would benefit monetarily from not having to deal with the safety aspect of AI, and that does sound suspicious to me.

Another technical piece of this bill relates to open-source AI models. [...] There’s a caveat that if a developer spends more than 25% of the cost to train Llama 3 on fine-tuning, that developer is now responsible. That said, opponents of the bill still find this unfair and not the right approach.

In regards to the open source models, while it makes sense that if a developer takes the model and does a significant portion of the fine tuning, they should be liable for the result of that...

But should the main developer still be liable if a bad actor does less than 25% fine tuning and uses exploits in the base model?

One could argue that developers should be trying to examine their black-boxes for vunerabilities, rather than shrugging and saying it can't be done then demanding they not be held liable.

When you're calling a terrorist organisation your ally, surely you've got to realise what side of history you're on right?

I mean Putin probably does, but he doesn't care as long as he gets to be ~~king~~ president

Alright, fine. You can have 20 miles or so, but nothing more. Oh and all the islands around it are still our's.

Could've told you that 10 years ago. Literally the moment online came out and they suddenly they stopped talking about story DLCs, I knew we weren't getting them.

The story-mode campaign is now just a gateway drug to their online cash-cow - I bet you it'll be the same for GTA 6

Win11 becomes a less and less appealing switch day by day... When I can no longer hold into Win10, I think I'll just have to jump ship to Linux.

Win10 is already quite privacy poor, but Win11 is straight up intolerable.

I agree on them being safe - when rules are properly adhered to, they're extremely safe, similarly to air travel. People only suspect their safety because when they do fail, they tend to fail spectacularly, again similar to air travel.

Having said that, they may be efficient to operate, but they are by no means efficient to build. They cost a lot of resources, and have a 10 year lead time - plus you need to worry about the cost of waste storage and decommissioning.

So sure, nuclear is better than fossil fuels, but you're just kicking the nonrenewable can down the road.

That time and resources would be far better spent on renewables, because that where humanity is gonna have to go long-term no matter how well any other alternatives work.