Th4tGuyII

joined 1 year ago
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 87 points 11 months ago (18 children)

Arguably their biggest mistake was trying to fight both world superpowers at once, in the USSR and Great Britain backed by the US. I can't imagine how they thought that would go well, but thank fuck they did, cause I wouldn't want to see the world they envisioned.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 7 points 11 months ago

Most Greentexts are, but it's often more fun to joke as though it were not

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 3 points 11 months ago

You got me good with that punchline

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 57 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Anon managed to pull off a double homicide of the movie night and his social life, all while being completely blind up his own arse. That shit's impressive.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 67 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children)

at the end of the day my right shoulder smells of women's perfume

That's gotta count for something right?

If you have to ask this question, you know it doesn't count.

Also, I think you'd be better trying to flirt with the Salsa ladies than sniffing for their perfume on your shoulder

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 11 points 11 months ago

It's a race to the bed, as everybody knows monsters can't invade your bed, that's why so many of them live under it

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 201 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And that is why you should always test newfound superpowers on a small scale before blowing your load on freezing time for 6 months you depraved Anon

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The goals of the war being?...

Oh right, the destruction of every non-Israeli living in Gaza.

  • Why else would they go after Hospitals treating innocent Palestinian victims?

  • Why else would they spend months and months denying any and all foreign aid to Gaza after cutting them off from all food, water, and electricity?

  • Why else would they airstrike clearly marked aid convoys for Gaza going along a pre-agreed route?

  • Why else would members of the IDF record thselves killing innocent Palestinians?

  • Why else would they oppose any and all peace deals, and openly plot to betray any and all ceasefires?

Israel has killed more than 30,000 innocent people. You can't just call that collateral or even callous disregard, it's mass murder, a genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

Hamas are not good guys by any stretch, but if you're being morally high-grounded by a terrorist organisation, then you ought to know which side of history you're on.

Edit: Israeli not Israelite

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

At the time I got my current system, I did 1tb SSD for the main, and a 4tb HDD for data drive.

For my next system, I think I'll split that a bit more evenly, as most of my games end up on the HDD which means they a bit to load

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So providing a fine-tuned model shouldn't either.

I didn't mean in terms of providing. I meant that if someone provided a base model, someone took that, built upon it, then used it for a harmful purpose - of course the person modified it should be liable, not the base provider.

It's like if someone took a version of Linux, modified it, then used that modified version for an illegal act - you wouldn't go after the person who made the unmodified version.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SB 1047 is a California state bill that would make large AI model providers – such as Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Mistral – liable for the potentially catastrophic dangers of their AI systems.

Now this sounds like a complicated debate - but it seems to me like everyone against this bill are people who would benefit monetarily from not having to deal with the safety aspect of AI, and that does sound suspicious to me.

Another technical piece of this bill relates to open-source AI models. [...] There’s a caveat that if a developer spends more than 25% of the cost to train Llama 3 on fine-tuning, that developer is now responsible. That said, opponents of the bill still find this unfair and not the right approach.

In regards to the open source models, while it makes sense that if a developer takes the model and does a significant portion of the fine tuning, they should be liable for the result of that...

But should the main developer still be liable if a bad actor does less than 25% fine tuning and uses exploits in the base model?

One could argue that developers should be trying to examine their black-boxes for vunerabilities, rather than shrugging and saying it can't be done then demanding they not be held liable.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you're calling a terrorist organisation your ally, surely you've got to realise what side of history you're on right?

I mean Putin probably does, but he doesn't care as long as he gets to be ~~king~~ president

view more: ‹ prev next ›