TheFriar

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

I mean…isn’t he lame and corny since forever? And, like, a creep?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Nothing. Social media (and social-ish media like Reddit) have a strong, strong hold on people. Facebook is still an incredibly popular site. People don’t abandon social media sites until they literally have to, like in the instance of MySpace, vine. A company definitely contributes to that by tanking their own UI and making people leave, which in turn causes a downward spiral of the company grabbing on harder to the dwindling user base, trying to monetize them harder and harder, until they company itself bottoms out and shuts down the servers.

Those of us that left Reddit willingly when we were tired of being used by them are in the very small minority. They lost, what, like 1-2% of their user base when nearly every single comment in any thread about the API debacle that said, “this is the last straw, I’m leaving and deleting my comment history” was getting massive amounts of support? People on the internet talk a big game, but ultimately are hopelessly addicted to their routines.

This is all by design, of course. We’re conditioned to open their apps and sites by reflex when we turn on the phone or computer. It fuckin works. But dammit if it doesn’t feel good breaking that spell. But it’s super disappointing others are willing to take every slap to the face and simply say “thank you sir may I have another.” Those people contribute to enshittification as much as the companies, honestly.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That title is…misleading. Why start it that way?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Woah. Move over, Mercedes, Audi…other luxury car companies…FERRARI! That’s one.

From now on, I only drive Gold.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You’re telling me gold doesn’t immediately diminish in value after you move it a few feet from where you purchased it?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago

That’s kinda the point though. They don’t give a shit about protecting our data. They’ve willingly engaged in the data trading markets themselves. It’s greatly enhanced their power. They’ve protected the practice by simple virtue of dumping fuck tons of money into it. But as soon as other players get into the game…”quick, to the gavel-mobile!”

This bill isn’t for us. It’s for them. I’m no fan of china—it’s an authoritarian state that forcefully exerts control over its people—but to the US, they’re just the next game in town. Because while china may be a little more overtly controlling, the US is in the same game. They just use the frontman of their independent corporations to more subtly exert influence. But when we start trying to wrest some control back? Sure, that’s when the gavels turn to batons and guns.

So, in short, they’re not protecting us. They’re protecting themselves and their established order. Cracks are starting to show because people on the whole seem to be realizing this order doesn’t work for us, but for them. They will start to more overtly flex their power as this trend continues.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

“New poison has been added to arsenic. Should you stop drinking it? Subscribe to find out.”

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago

Gluing components together so it's not easy/impossible to repair is different to 'designing to die'. In my opinion designed to die suggests the ear pods will die prematurely due to intentional design decisions. Gluing components together just means that when the ear pods die, then they cannot be brought back to life and you have to replace them.

But they’re designed with the knowledge that the small battery has a brief usability period. Which is like putting a time bomb in there knowing the people will probably buy more of their products. Putting something inside that can’t be removed and that has a short lifespan is designing a product to die. In other words, it’s designed to die with plenty of good parts left inside when the part that’s quickest to die can’t be replaced. They’re turning a bunch of long lifespan stuff into disposable. That’s an intentional design decision that makes the product die prematurely.

As they said in the article, they could easily make this a replaceable part. But they glue it in so that’s near impossible. Not to mention how long apple fought right to repair legislation. They know exactly what they’re doing.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Because substack.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe these summarizations have always been bad, but every time I read one (which has only been in the past couple of months…maybe I’m just getting lazy) they’re terrible. Borderline nonsensical.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago (7 children)

What did nordvpn do that makes you hate them?

view more: ‹ prev next ›