TheOubliette

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Norway is a capitalist country. It us an OECD hanger-on to the US-led imperialist world order.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

Sam Altman has refused to even provide evidence for this. His claim only has legs due to implicit sinophobia in his audience.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

Then you need to work on your empathy and understanding of geopolitics.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 24 points 7 months ago

Least racist settler

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago

The entirety of their logic is myopic electoralism handed down to them by the most insufferable party climbers imaginable. If you are against their neoliberal blue genocider, you must be for the other tean's red neoliberal genocider, because all of politics must be condensed to the next / the last election day and which neoliberal horse may win it.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 months ago

You're talking to people that want to continue rationalizing their tacit, frequently racist support for genocide, and their easiest out has always been to say, "but Trump is worse". They have never done the introspection required to look at their own personal role as a political being beyond what they're told to do by the Democratic Party and their donors: slacktivist vote shaming, always presuming the high ground for themselves (even while tolerating genocide!), and doing as little as possible on the ground outside of minor exercises in false catharsis like a cop-escorted, permitted march or an ignored letter writing campaign.

When challenged on this by people on the left that do read and do self-reflect, these are the folks that responded in bad faith, even when the context is genocide, because they have made politics into an extension of their egos rather than a project to which to subordinate yourself and devote real work to.

Whining about .ml is their way of pretending to be vindicated every time Trump does something bad, as they cannot actually argue against what the people in .ml say, they must rely on inventions and emotional implications.

In short, many on .ml vocally opposed supporting genociding Democrats. None that I'm aware of expected Trump to be better. At best, a roll of the dice.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

"Here are several terminally online streamers. Are they cooking oe are they cooked?"

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Under capitalism, profit maximization is necessary for the company you own to survive. You cannot be a "nice capitalist", at least not for long. A person that is nice will have to conform their behavior to maximize profits anyways.

This dynamic does not exist in other systems, where your class membership makes you a relentless recursive tool of the market.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's describing capitalism, where profit maximization is systemically required for one to fulfill their role at "the top" and monopoly is the best way to increase profits.

Historically, "greed" was not the main characteristic of the ruling class. They did not exist under capitalism. Money itself often meant little. Land, a military, prestige, yes. But money fir money's sake was officially frowned upon and generally left to the clergy to handle the hypocrisy.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

No, feudalism has different economic relations than capitalism. It is about farm product graft from land-bound peasants on penalty of death or injury. Capitalism is about wage working. Capitalism emerged in the context of feudalism, so there were periods where both existed side by side, but capitalism is clearly different.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

Do you think the USSR and Eastern Europe were free from the tendencies of capitalism to create imperialist war? The only post-WWII wars in Eastern Europe were skirmishes by capitalist-funded nationalists (quasi-fascists) and the civil war in Yugoslavia exacerbated by NATO to balkanize the country. The wars that the USSR supported were all pre-existing national liberation movements against imperialist colonizers, and they nearly always entered after imperialists had thrown massive resources into oppression. For example, Vietnam.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I thought it would be implied that I'm speaking about modern times. The economic system is the msin driver in large societies, though. In Europe, prior to capitalism, the primary determinant was feudal interests.

Chimps don't have war. They fight, but is every skirmish a war? Wars come from creating and wielding armies.

view more: ‹ prev next ›