Trainguyrom

joined 1 year ago
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

About 10 years ago I used headphones daily, now I do so just frequently enough that it's irritating to realize I need to purchase a dongle just to do so and go "well I guess I'm not listening to music/podcasts right now"

What I learned when working for a phone manufacturer is that the headphone jack usage varies by product segment. Cheaper phone users use the headphone jack far more frequently than premium phone users, so they'd keep it on the budget models but drop it on the higher end models. They also did similar with NFC and wireless charging which was interesting...

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

2020 kinda accelerated the existing trends and got a majority of people willing to watch films at home instead of in theaters. Before that enough people really enjoyed the theater experience that it wasn't too much of a threat to the business model

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

For public facing only use key based authentication. Passwords have too much risk associated for public facing ssh

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

The state university in the town I live in has a policy that freshmen must live in the dorms unless they already live within city limits (small college town, so the university literally has a student body of about 1/2 the permanent residents of the town)

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

What is it with these schools and not just using WPA Enterprise? They already hand out an email to every student so it makes it dead simple to deactivate the account's PSK upon terming the student

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

About a decade ago I was playing a game on Linux and the game crashed and took the entire DE with it. So I went to a different tty and started a fresh x desktop session and started playing again until the game crashed again (I was running a bunch of mods so it would crash every couple of hours or so) and still didn't feel like rebooting so I went to yet another tty and started yet another x desktop session. I did this about 3 times in total before I finally went "I should probably actually reboot because this has to be making a bigger mess of things"

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you buy a PC it has Windows on it. The majority of people are not cocking about formatting a USB stick and fiddling with the BIOS to put Linux on it.

And increasingly the majority of people don't even bother to keep a PC anymore and just use their phone

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Finally the kind of competition that can knock Conksat from it's pedestal!

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

This was a landing failure of a booster after returning from it's mission. Boosters have always been expendable one-and-done parts that would be jettisoned to burn up in the atmosphere. Boeing currently has no roadmap for reusable boosters, meanwhile SpaceX has launched this particular booster 23 times! These booster failures are extremely rare and any booster recovery for any space agency/company that isn't SpaceX is notable. SpaceX is the only agency/company that has recovered and reused a booster, and they've done so hundreds of times.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Launch_outcomes

Note there was 1 launch failure this year which was their first launch failure since 2016, almost 10 years with hundreds of launches between failures.

The last booster to be lost on a landing was in 2023 and not even a booster failure but simply rough seas:

First booster to fly for the 19th time. Despite the landing being initially successful, the booster later tipped over during transit due to rough seas, high winds and waves, the stage was unable to be secured to the deck for recovery and later tipped over and was destroyed in transit. SpaceX has already equipped newer Falcon boosters with upgraded landing legs that have the capability to self-level and mitigate this type of issue.

So in short, yes it is bad that a booster which shouldn't have been lost was. But in terms of crew safety this isn't a huge concern. SpaceX simply has an incredible track record for successful missions and has become the "safe" bet in aerospace

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago

D&D is ultimately a set of rules to guide a group improv storytelling session. One of the first rules of improv is "yes and" so you go with it within the confines of the game rules as well as what people are comfortable with. This is where /u/starbuck@lemmy.world's suggestion of "Ranlar slowly rises from his wheelchair before collapsing under his own weight as his atrophied legs give out. Your party must now find a way to move him away from the orcs without using his newly healed legs, perhaps on a nearby chair with wheels." Fits so well. It "yes and"s the spell while remaining true to the other player's wishes.

The DMs job is to maintain the fun for the players, and if one player is ruining others fun they need to be spoken with and kicked out if they aren't able to be a team player. Personally, I treat a NAT20 (and critical failures) as an opportunity to do something comical that helps advance the story and improve the lore, because that creates the moments you tell to others when sharing fun stories about D&D

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pshhh. Does Europe even exist? Next you'll try to tell me there's other continents with actual people on them too or something crazy like that

view more: ‹ prev next ›