Traister101

joined 1 year ago
[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 10 points 9 months ago

AI generated slop. Wouldn't really call her a loli. Doesn't look like a child

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah so firstly Matsuri isn't actually a loli (though yes I'll admit that's intended to be loli art). But I also happen to know of that artist as they got me as well. For example NSFW Tasumaki from One Punch Man or NSFW Yor from Spy Family but then this same person will draw Takagi as a middle schooler taking a dick.

Voosh clearly doesn't think very hard when downloading shit off Twitter cause the AI horse is really obvious. Pretty easy to believe that second Matsuri picture (the loli one) wasn't caught cause it's not obvious enough. Dude likes cock he's not paying much attention to anything else.

Edit: Clarification

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 26 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Vaush did not in fact have any loli porn. One (some?) of the art he downloaded happened to be drawn by somebody who for some reason chose not to draw lolicon that day and Vaush innocently thought it looked hot. As somebody who spends way too much time on pixiv it's happened to me enough I've made a habit of thoroughly checking an artists profile cause some really freaky people love drawing normal stuff every once in awhile. It's quite off-putting.

What we should really be talking about is the obvious AI art he had downloaded like a absolute troglodyte (and the horse stuff has been known for years but it's still funny)

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

LLMs don't "learn" they literally don't have the capacity to "learn". We train them on an insane amount of text and then the LLMs job is to produce output that looks like that text. That's why when you attempt to correct it nothing happens. It can't learn, it doesn't have the capacity to.

Humans aren't "word guessing machines". Humans produce language with intent and meaning. This is why you and I can communicate. We use language to represent things. When I say "Tree" you know what that is because it's the word we use to describe an object we all know about. LLMs don't know what a tree is. They can use "tree" in a sentence correctly but they don't know what it means. They can even translate it to another language but they still don't know what "tree" means. What they know is generating text that looks like what they were trained on.

Here's a well made video by Kyle Hill that will teach you lot better than I could

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 5 points 9 months ago

Yep. Been having trouble with mine recently, it's managed to learn my typos and it's getting quite frustrating

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 12 points 9 months ago (7 children)

You are best off thinking of LLMs as highly advanced auto correct. They don't know what words mean. When they output a response to your question the only process that occurred was "which words are most likely to come next".

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago

Uh yes, they do. It's the same group of people falling for this stuff over and over. Crypto, NFTs, Self Driving, AI now. What's important to them is being able to point at this stuff and make a wojack face

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the interesting thing they don't. They typically do the best they can to make lives worse for their constituents and they'll be happy about it as long as the "others" are getting fucked over more than they are.

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo has yet to do anything but as we've seen from Pokémon mods in the past they like to wait up until release. Dudes got a video on the topic if you want to hear it from his own mouth https://youtu.be/AdBzok8GjA0

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 4 points 10 months ago

Plus nobody would actually want to live in the metaverse we see in media; Snowcrash, Ready Player One ect. The metaverse that's being advertised is a dystopia just like the ones we've had in media. Not to mention all the practical problems of like needing to virtually walk to the virtual store to buy shit, no way in hell is that catching on.

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's been "new" battery technology in the works since we starting using lithium ion and nothing so far has come anywhere near close enough to replace it. Sodium just like all the other "exciting" failed ideas in the past decade isn't gonna go anywhere either.

Sodium batteries on the infrastructure level would work wonderfully but you'll never see them in your phone or even a car. The energy density just is shit. There would need to be some unexpected advance in the technology to gain ~50% energy density just to meet lower end lithium ion.

But really electric cars aren't the future anyway what we need to invest in is public transportation. Electric busses, trains, trams, hell why not self driving scooters that's way more practical than a whole ass car.

view more: ‹ prev next ›