I never said that Bluesky is part of the fediverse for example and the rest of your comment seems to me like it should be directed to OP or devs of ATProto and not me.
Tywele
joined 2 years ago
Yes and that's why I don't understand their comment and even less why it gets downvoted. They seem to complain about something to me that I didn't even mention and the topic was not about combining ATProto with ActivityPub or whatever.
Maybe relate wasn't the right word. English isn't my native language.
How does your comment relate to my comment?
I also think that this is how it should be. Initially I thought I wouldn't need multiple accounts for the fediverse. Right now I'm more active on Bluesky than on Mastodon so it would be great to have an AT Protocol equivalent to Lemmy/Reddit and all that without having to create a new account for it.
It's not impossible for them to do. They just don't want to do it.
I can't remember the last time I connected my phone to my computer via USB to transfer files. I bet the vast majority are the same.
Maybe Krita is the solution to your problem?
As your link states these are just early access limitations.
What would be the point of putting in the effort to make Bluesky or other ATProtocol apps selfhostable if they didn't want people to do that? Doesn't make any sense
Do you mean my Lemmy profile? Thank you I guess
How can it be EEE if it's their own protocol?
Also there is much more open source from Bluesky: https://github.com/bluesky-social
Why did you write your comment as an answer to my comment then if it's not directed at me?