What "we?"
UlyssesT
There was no meaningful point made, just a bad faith demand in defense of corporations.
it makes them seem all the more credible...
To a credulous rube like yourself, sure. Keep licking that boot! Maybe one day you can wear it!
Can we be honest about this
Saying "can we be honest" isn't a magic spell that transmutes your opinion to fact.
patently dishonest ignore that he was effectively breaking and entering, plus installing a data harvesting device in the server room, which any organization in the world would rightfully identity as a hostile.
Worm regards.
You sure about that, or are you hypothesizing?
Because they're corporate bootlickers, paid or otherwise.
Look at the people that participate in "Hacker News."
The hackers are mostly not okay. Fucking bootlickers.
One time on the old run of Beavis and Butt-Head, Beavis complained that diarrhea medicine didn't work. He took a whole bottle of it, he said, and then he complained that he never got diarrhea.
They're so amazingly dogmatic, too. There's this subtext belief that Nintendo's business decisions are somehow profoundly and uniquely wise, such as the claim that there can't be a new F-Zero game because "there's no conceivable way to make it different each time, which is a Nintendo(tm)(r) mandate" as if it wouldn't be enough to add weapons to the vehicles, customization/performance modifications, power allocation, outright flying or even space segments, or even out-of-the-car gameplay.
Nope. Just the "make it different each time" of the Zelda plot rehashes forever and ever.
Or, make it "different each time" by making it janky in a way most people don't like, like Star Fox Zero which was also a plot rehash, and then shelve the franchise because people didn't like it. Nintendo is that infallible!
"And what games you can buy will be bundled with Ice Climbers. Always with Ice Climbers."
Thank you for the clarification; without context I couldn't tell.