UraniumBlazer

I'm really skeptical of its success primarily due to the immense costs of hosting video. Peertube exists already, and isn't nearly as successful as Mastodon/Lemmy primarily due to its hosting costs.

For sure! <3

Awh they're so wholesome and positive. Thanks for sharing these :)

I have hundreds of short form videos which are designed to uplift, encourage, and speak positively about mental health issues.

Could you please drop a link to them? If what u'r saying is true, well I kinda need em at this point in time :(

So tiktok for the fediverse...

Listen, I'm all for open sourcing stuff and I'm all for the fediverse and all. I just don't understand why one would want a fediverse tiktok.

• Short form content is addictive af and doesn't add anything of substance to society.
• Video hosting is expensive. Peertube is already struggling. How do you expect to financially sustain video hosting that is addictive to the user (which means more consumption) without running ads? Paywalling it won't be an option due to the network effect as well.

Very interesting video, I had no idea the level of redundancy built into QR codes.

RIGHT?!! Same here. I didn't know there was SO MUCH of thought put behind QR codes. I always assumed they were just bits visually represented in 2D with the three black squares being there for alignment purposes. Turns out it is a lot more complicated than that hehe

Thanks!

Np <3

Dayum, that's nice! Maybe I'll use it if I ever want to learn a new language

Does Duolingo come up with personalised tests n stuff? Never used it much haha

Did u read the abstract? They're presenting a framework to use LLMs as educators in higher education. It's quite cool really.

The idea is to create a professor personalised for every student and their learning patterns. Imagine hiring a professor to personally teach you something. The professor talks to you, creates little tests specifically for what they think are your weaknesses are in the subject matter and so on.

This is very good for us as human researchers will now be able to dedicate (assuming this tech works) 100% of their time to research instead of teaching the same subject matter again and again every single year, coming up with tests, marking tests, grading their students' papers and so on.

If this tech is successful, then education costs would nosedive like crazy, which would be good for all.

I'm confident we should start seeing stuff like this soon. The upcoming ChatGPT model (forgot the version name) is doing recursive prompts for itself, where it breaks down a big task into smaller ones, then runs and reruns those tasks before coming up with an output.

Right now, all LLMs just do a single pass and spit out the output. They don't reason with themselves like we do yet. It's kinda like what we do in quiz competitions or something, where we immediately shout "blue" when asked "what color is the sky". However, when asked something more complicated, we don't just answer quickly based on intuition, do we? We pause, think, rethink, look for counter arguments, patch holes in our statements and so on.

This is the ability that LLMs lack now. However, very soon they will be able to do that. This just opens up a crazy amount of things that they can do. Take code for example. Right now, LLMs just spit out code without seeing if it works or not. Now, they'll be able to run it themselves, look for errors, bugs and so on, fix them and finally submit the output code.

Stuff like this would supercharge them quite a lot. Now, I know that I'm going to be downvoted to hell for talking about AI, cuz lemmy hates it. Mark my words though - you'll be able to do A LOT using LLMs because of this.

AI is going to exist and improve like crazy no matter what. The leftist position on this should be public ownership over these models and NOT pretending that they don't exist.

If it is approved by the FDA? HECK YEAH BAYBEEE

No association with any account. Therefore, no profiling.