Vandals_handle

joined 1 year ago
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Accessed through Jira huh, that's pretty epic but this aggression will not stand up! I can imagine the hackers sprinting away with baguettes under the their arm. Such a scrummy thing to do.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Happiness is a warm gun?

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yortuk and Georg? You cruise correctly.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Classifying employees as management without having actual management duties is a violation of federal labor law. You might be owed back wages/overtime. Could be worth looking into. A class action lawsuit against a previous employer I had led to hundreds of employees getting checks for thousands of dollars, even after lawyers took their fee.

Some technical jobs can be legally classified exempt from overtime. That is different than being classified as management.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe you've veered into possible but far from practical territory.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Half the light plus are functionally sunglasses and would be hazardous for a pedestrian to be wearing in the dark. The only time a pedestrian would be able to see is when a vehicle was illuminating the area.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Was walking the dogs at five am when I realized the impracticality of this statement. You are suggesting people wear sunglasses at night so automobile drivers don't have to slow down to a speed safe for the conditions. Just don't overdrive your headlights so you can safely see and react to anything (cyclists, pedestrians, livestock, rhythm pigs, critters in the road)

Also retrofitting all front and back windshields of all existing vehicles on the road.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (7 children)

And pedestrians and cyclists?

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

The land is only cheap when you pretend those externalized environmental costs do not exist. They still have to be paid, usually by the public at large. I think the saying goes; socialize the cost and privatize the gains.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Build over existing infrastructure. One example is current project to cover water canals with solar. Don't need to acquire land, reduces evaporation saving water, reduces plant growth in canals lowering maintenance costs.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

John Howard Griffin

view more: next ›