VerPoilu

joined 1 year ago
[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 143 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don't just "delete" Twitter as in deleting the app. Please also close your account.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is the database of websites installed locally in the extension or is it calling home for every website I visit?

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

It works on Android, but I don't believe it works on iOS.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

For that they use iframes, which have a different security system.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because of the CORS settings on Google's servers would tell your browser to not go forward with the request. There are two ways it could eventually be possible:

  • By opening the video in a new page/tab that only contains the video, with the YouTube player, which defeats the purpose a bit.
  • By installing an addon or an app on your device.
[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Fair enough, that's interesting. I assume this only applies to the non-web clients. On the web, it would not be possible. You can verify by looking at the outgoing network requests on this random video for example: https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=qKMcKQCQxxI

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz -5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I'm pretty confident that you are wrong.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Invidious and YouTube piped (and LibreTube) by default load the videos server-side, as opposed to GrayJay, NewPipe or Smarttube.

It has advantages (mostly that your IP address is not shared with YouTube, and it allows users from countries where YouTube is blocked to still access it) and inconvenients (much harder to keep up when YouTube actively seeks to block them).

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

LibreTube is also a good one. Basically an app for piped

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Browsers based on chromium do not have to follow exactly what the main branch is doing. If they want to keep supporting MV2 or support different rules for MV3, they can. Albeit it's a bit cumbersome.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately, I think that while ad blockers won't work as well, they will still work good enough that most won't bother making the switch.

https://blog.getadblock.com/how-adblock-is-getting-ready-for-manifest-v3-6cf21a7884f6

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/

https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mv3.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1067als/comment/j3h00xj/

The main issue I see is the slow update of filters (which require an extension update). This might make YouTube win the cat and mouse game. Where YouTube updates(ed?) their blocking detection multiple time a day.

view more: next ›