Wanpieserino

joined 1 month ago
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago (24 children)

I actually am hahahhaa.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (36 children)

Nah, America really spread a lot of information throughout the world on these things. So much even that people got sick of it.

America is all about branding, sure they might not structurally provide a good system for these people, but they do grant them a good brand to use.

The public opinion of these people have mooned quite a bit.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are you not? Why else are you so ashamed?

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

So you agree that capitalism is the best way to develop a country. So, capitalism is good? It relocates everytime to a poorer country. Developing that country.

At the end, the whole world will be developed. I'm not an anarchist, so I'm quite fond of governments creating stability in their region. (Not a revolutionary indeed).

North Korea and Cuba joining globalist trade is fine by me. Cuba already sends out their doctors abroad.

Cuba trades a lot with Spain and China.

Problem though. Their doctors would earn more money in other Latin American countries. Which they often do. They emigrate to one of those countries and then have their family live a luxurious life in Havana.

This is because in those other countries, even though same level of wealth, they are self employed as doctors. They get the entire fruits of their labour :)

Competition is very important. Just like you don't want Elon musk to be a monopolist, you don't want a government to be a monopolist either. Competition is necessary.

I don't know much about Vietnam, so I didn't talk about them. Their language makes me go insane not gonna lie 🥲

I did watch documentaries about Cuba though, so talking a bit more about that.

I'm not a fan of revolutions. Look at Libya and Syria. Revolutions aren't good.

If you want to do a revolution, you better accept to live a full generation in pure poverty in the hope that your children will have it better.

Then compare it to a place that has been having stability in the same period.

The place with stability will be stronger on the global scene most likely. Such as Switzerland Vs the rest of Europe that were involved in world war 2.

Stability means growth.

You view me as a pessimist and I view you as a pessimist. You see no other way out than revolution.

I can assure you, in my day to day life I am the optimist. My wife's rather pessimistic aha.

Like when trump crashed the market and I pumped it full. My wife was like "you're having a baby, you need to be careful".

Right now the stocks look green af.

I'm saying I'mma take a 100k euros mortgage.

She's like "we're having a baby, can you even afford that?"

Tsk tsk tsk 🌝

Edit: let's ask my best buddy the cat from mistral AI 😤

Estimating the percentage of revolutions that bring prosperity is challenging due to the varied nature of revolutions and their outcomes. However, based on historical observations, it's clear that while some revolutions have led to significant improvements in economic and political conditions, many others have resulted in instability, conflict, or the rise of new repressive regimes.

Factors that influence the success of a revolution in bringing prosperity include:

  1. Goals and Leadership: Revolutions with clear goals and competent leadership are more likely to achieve positive outcomes.
  2. Popular Support: Broad-based support from the population can help stabilize the post-revolutionary period.
  3. International Context: Support or interference from other countries can significantly impact the revolution's outcome.
  4. Economic Conditions: The state of the economy before, during, and after the revolution plays a crucial role in determining prosperity.
  5. Institutional Strength: The ability to establish strong and fair institutions post-revolution is vital for long-term prosperity.

Given these factors, a rough estimate might be that a minority of revolutions—perhaps around 20-30%—lead to sustained economic prosperity and political stability. This estimate is speculative and based on the general understanding that successful revolutions are relatively rare and often face significant challenges in achieving their goals.

Okay...

Leadership? You can do that, I believe in you.

Popular support. No, you simply are a minority.

Nobody in Europe wants a revolution. Guess what the last revolution was, it was to not be communist 😬

International support. You can get China's support

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

Your ideology doesn't have any allies then. It's used in Cuba and in North Korea. That's all.

In Cuba, they are losing ground because the people don't want the government to have a monopoly on labour.

North Korea is kim's paradise

Your only hope is to brand china communist. But are they?

"The private sector already accounts for over 60% of GDP, 70% of technological innovation, and, more potently, employs over 80% of the workforce across the country's urban cities."

Chinese capitalists own majority stakes everywhere in the world. They control the cobalt in Congo for example.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

Well I'd prefer if you could think about the stuff I actually said, but if you wanna just yell at eachother. That's fine too. Honestly it's your choice, I give you both options. I always do

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why are you talking about a revolution in someone else's country

You're aware that the vast majority of revolutions are a disaster for people?

That's their own decision to make

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just fuck up your country, doesn't matter to me. Already made good money on trump crashing the market

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Oh, so you look at the amount of wealth in USA and the low taxation rate of 6,5% and think they are there because you people are special? It's because your government chooses to gather as much capital and tax only a small part. Which causes tax revenue to still be beneficial for USA.

Are you going to throw in another ad hominem? Or are you gonna actually say something

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago

Half the country voted for this a 2nd time. They likely have to talk with the 100 million people that are pro trump.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (6 children)

So you're not giving us all the capital that fled to your country because of low taxation?

But I thought you wanted to tax them? Oh but, they can't leave when you tax them, right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›