WatDabney

joined 1 year ago
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a coup.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 113 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In a way, doesn't that mean that it would be more accurate to say that the bot stopped being rogue and went legit?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 79 points 2 weeks ago (34 children)

I've never understood how or why this is an issue.

Shortly after Spez's petulant AMA, I ran across a link for Lemmy. org. It looked interesting, so I followed it. I poked around a bit, and it still looked interesting, so I picked an instance and created an account. I played with it a bit, then I went back and found a different instance that looked interesting and created an account there too. And I just kept reading and posting, just like I'd done on Reddit (and half a dozen different sites before that). Some instances came and went and I lost some accounts and created others and eventually settled into a few that I like best, and just read and posted and didn't leave. The end.

But it seems that every time I turn around, someone's going on about the hardships of moving to a different site and all the difficulties to be overcome and yadda yadda yadda, and I just don't get it. At all.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

And if the world were a just place instead of a twisted shithole designed to maximize the privilege of a relative few wealthy and empowered parasites, you could work fewer hours, make the same or even more money and afford a house.

But instead the system has been warped so that you have to work long hours for insufficient pay and still can't afford a decent life, and all so that a relative few executives, board nembers, bankers, investors and politicians can siphon off the bulk of the wealth you generate so that they can buy more houses and bigger yachts.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 months ago

No - actually I was talking worldwide. Russia's just a notable example.

And I would say that all of the things you listed are, directly or indirectly, consequences of the fact that wealthy authoritarian parasites have warped societies to their benefit regardless of the harm done to others, so are actually examples of exactly what I'm talking about.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 320 points 5 months ago (17 children)

News flash for wealthy authoritarian parasites around the world, because you all seem ignorant of this fact:

Declining birthrates are a direct result of the simple fact that more people all the time decide that they have no desire to bring children into this world, and that in turn is a direct result of the fact that you've turned this world into a warped, corrupt, toxic, authoritarian shithole.

You have no one to blame but yourselves.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

I think you have forums confused with microblogs.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 34 points 5 months ago (36 children)

I presume I'm supposed to care, but I dont, and I don't know why anyone would.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago

So... Meta's "plan" is to dodge responsibility?

Gee whiz... I sure never saw that coming....

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago

Just be patient.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago (11 children)

With all due respect, fuck the normies. The fediverse is better off without them.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

If he’s trying to say “Biden wanted this but Trump already started it”

Which "he?"

Zuckerberg blames it exclusively and entirely on the Biden administration.

that tells me BOTH parties requested it. Hence, if you don’t like Biden because of this, you don’t want Trump either. And of course, vice versa. In short, this policy is not unique to either party or administration.

Exactly, but that's explicitly not what Zuckerberg is saying. He's saying that it was entirely and exclusively Biden, which is a lie.

view more: next ›