WindyRebel

joined 2 years ago
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

GOP projecting again. Sounds like the party has a porn addiction!

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What if I have bird blindness and I try and teach it to a duck?

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes. Thank you for that correction! I knew it shared one and I conflated the assembly line with the platform.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, and the Mazda6 and Mustang shared a platform.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah, but with the definition having multiple meanings then can easily make that call.

the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction

So all those things posted online like “food porn,” “travel porn,” etc can be classified as pornography because now we have a definition that isn’t necessarily sexual.

It’s bullshit, but they can still make it the definition used to make their case about why it’s “bad.” GOP is good at using broad strokes to paint their evil.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Happy dweeb/nerd confirmed here. Single player, story-driven is where it’s at.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We’ll fuck, I forgot about Dre!

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I understood this reference! Probably because I, too, am a dinosaur.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It’s Apple or Google pretty much here for us Americans. Who do you think we should support? Or do you think we should go back to t9 Nokias?

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree, but I think we should amend this phrase.

Release the UNREDACTED Epstein files

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wow! Thanks for this response. That makes a lot of sense as to how it’s done.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Thank you for that explanation!

So, this is probably dumb but could their whole argument be that it’s E2EE from your phone to their server, which unpacks it and reads it, then repackages it and E2EE from the server to the recipient while the AI sends the summary back to you E2EE from the server?

It’s so stupid, but I could see their marketing saying that it’s technically E2EE just with a…detour (e.g., we don’t say the whole process was E2EE in one trip).

Once again, I’m not sticking up for them. I am just trying to wrap my head around how they could justify this shit at all.

view more: next ›