WoahWoah

joined 1 year ago
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago

I mean low-key that's kind of a brilliant way to make the argument.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because the person who said those things and to whom I'm responding is the "Trump voter" I specifically referenced? In case the fact that I'm directly responding to their comment and they're the OP of this post didn't make it clear enough for you.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump voter believes in small government. Also that the state should be able to legally compel you to electronically track your children and that 11-year-olds shouldn't be able to walk around outside without constant surveillance and sides with parents being arrested for allowing it. Believes "some" parental freedom should be "allowed."

I just rolled my eyes so hard I gave myself a headache.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

The vehicles with a higher automated driving rating than Tesla use a more diverse range of sensory inputs. While it may not make fully autonomous driving, it very clearly would have made Tesla closer to it based on the fact that cars that use things like lidar in addition to cameras surpassed Tesla's rating many years ago.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Finally someone else familiar with the most deadly animal in North America.

 

NBC has delayed airing a new documentary about Trump's child-separation policy, described by MSNBC's Chris Hayes as "absolutely urgent," until December, despite its importance for public interest. The reason behind the delay appears to be concerns that airing it earlier could hurt Trump's feelings, thereby making him unlikely to do an MSNBC debate. This decision has been criticized as prioritizing Trump's sensitivities over informing the public on a significant and painful policy issue.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The desperate need to try to wave away any possible negative effects from social media by people heavily dependent on social media comes as no surprise. It's like trying to criticize fast food to a fat person.

Some will acknowledge it's bad for them and eat it anyway, but most will just get extremely defensive about it and try to rationalize or downvote. It has vitamins! If you only eat the unfried vegetables and only drink water, it's actually good for you!

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are awesome. Can't believe someone picked up that reference.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The trace buster buster BUSTER!

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everyone is doing it. What are you even talking about. You can't unfuck the chicken.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (12 children)

It's just basic economics. The amount of power and influence you can generate with a disinformation troll farm dramatically outweighs the cost. It's a high impact, low cost form of geopolitical influence. And it works incredibly well.

view more: next ›