I agree with this perspective. The CEO felt like the more reasonable guy here who wanted to respectfully and professionally clear his name through polite conversation. And the writer here seemed very aggressive. The line of questioning was outwardly hostile and accusatory with literally nothing for good evidence.
Zengen
joined 1 year ago
Just do a judge trial instead of a jury trial. Lol
The first amendment says you do in fact have to tolerate them sir. You may not commit acts of violence against them for their speech or you get put in prison. Thats the way it is.
Its ironic. On a decentralized platform we are discussing how a big issue with streaming services is that they are not centralized ^-^
I dont even disagree with you. I just think its interesting that we dont apply the ideological standard of centralization and monopoly being inherently bad evenly across the board.
Im not really sure I have a greater point to make here. I'm not trying to knock or dissent what your saying at all.
Just a stoned observation.
You dont. You just have to be tolerant of their existence because theirr existance is protected by right and law. If you punch a Nazi your still getting charged with assault and battery. If you kill a racist your still going to jail. We dont illegalize views and ideas in america.
Let's develop an AI that can detect where ads in videos start and end. And cut them out client side. Anti corporate advertising AI :D