Zink

joined 2 years ago
[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Oh they do care, just in the wrong way.

In the business world "benchmarking" basically means "let's copy what the successful people do, so that line go up"

In their robotic, amoral view of the world, they see one of the most successful people on the planet (according to their definition of success) constantly spouting obvious lies and being surrounded by sycophants while getting elected twice and grifting billions and facing no punishments. Maybe if the tech CEOs get rich enough and their companies get important enough, they can join his club.

Ohhh, and they must be how we get oligarchies!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's a combination of that and the worry that there will be one winning ubercorp that practically merges with the US Government.

I mean, they are all pushing all their chips in at the same time. It's like they know it's now or never.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think the green specks they mentioned ARE the parts where it didn't work. It was not like an analog issue that might tint the color of all the pixels, it was a digital issue where more than 99% of the pixels were the EXACT correct color and then a handful of spots had corrupted data which manifests as green specks on that monitor.

I don't know what the specifications say should happen when data loss happens, but I'd much rather my screen show a random spot rather than refuse to display anything that's corrupted.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

you can think of the units of measure as multiplying and dividing sort of like the numbers themselves.

So if the nuclear battery continuously delivers 1 watt...

In one hour it would have delivered 1 Wh or watt-hour, because 1W * 1h = 1Wh.

And it works in reverse. If it takes 2 hours to deliver that 1 Wh? That's 1Wh per 2 hours or 1Wh/2h=0.5W!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

ahkshuallly, don't you mean a capacitor?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well maybe this time the new battery tech can be real and gay!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 19 points 2 weeks ago

I have two optimism-filled counterpoints to this.

  1. Happy childhood memories are often much nicer than actually existing as a child. Much more concentrated. You already have the good stuff.

  2. The only person stopping you from walking through the woods and finding cool rocks is you!

(insert caveats here about how adult life sucks for so many people right now and they don't have free time to wander in the woods. I know. It sucks. I can only encourage you to consider it a metaphor and find something realistic and rewarding that fits your life)

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is where the information economy starts to eat itself. If every message arrives pre-saturated with irony, critique, and self-awareness, then no signal can rise above the din. Warnings, reassurances, satire, and sales pitches collapse into the same register. The audience isn’t persuaded or misled so much as numbed.

It sounds like you are describing an unfolding future where all communication us ultra-processed.

I have posted about this a couple times, but ever since I saw Jon Stewart a while back describe modern propaganda as ultra-processed speech. It's engineered for reaction and engagement. It's like you said, everything collapses into the same register when there's a BOMBSHELL headline every day.

But the ultra-processed thing has been reaching much further into our media and culture than political speech for a while now. Like I dunno, everything that has half the people's faces buried in their phone in public.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean if we already have a dictator anyway, how about some infrastructure to go with it?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

To add more specifics here for you, note that the f-stop is usually shown as a fraction, like f/2.8, f/4.0, etc.

So first of all, since the number is on the bottom of the fraction, there's where you get smaller numbers = more light.

It's also shown as a fraction because it's a ratio, between your lens's focal length (not focal distance to the subject) and the diameter of the aperture.

So if I'm taking a telephoto shot with my 70-200 @ 200 with the aperture wide open at f/2.8, that means the aperture should appear as 200/2.8 = 71.4mm. And that seems right to me! If you're the subject looking into the lens the opening looks huge.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 128 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Hello, friends in civilized lands, especially those of you who work at financial institutions...

Some of us in the states are excited to watch you do some damage to the entrenched middlemen that have been skimming from all of us for so long. Please do consider letting us sign up for the new stuff. Our money is still worth something, for now!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 17 points 3 weeks ago

politicians argue "no one will want to be a cop if we hold them accountable for their actions."

That sounds a lot like when they insist that nobody will ever innovate if they ever have to pay taxes when they get rich off their product.

view more: ‹ prev next ›