Zink

joined 2 years ago
[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI will replace workers. AI will replace people who make art and music, and write things.

This part made me think how I've commented recently that AI does the thing it was designed to do, but that the thing it was designed to do is generate something you could believe somebody wrote on the internet.

That doesn't mean the answer is correct, of course. It's often confidently wrong, just like real people online!

But when it comes to artistic expression, there is no clear right or wrong. Music, art, and the written word are some of the most human things we have, but you are absolutely right that they will be replaced. If a marketing director can pay Google a few dollars to generate a hundred concept drawings so they can do "I'll know it when I see it" design, that's a human artist job they won't budget for.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep. My disdain for the combination of fascist government where everything is surveillance, and sociopathic corporations and billionaires where everything is a cynical cash grab, overcame me excitement for tech "products" a long time ago. I'm in the US so it's especially bad.

I still have a smart phone that's 4-5 years old, and I do of course use it every day, but I consciously avoid using it every hour. I love when I misplace it in my own house, to then not look for it for hours. The only person who is going to message me anything urgent is my wife and she knows where to find me.

Constant phone addiction is one of those situations where when you remove yourself from it you can more easily see it in others. It's like there's a new form of body language where when you see that slight forward tilt of the head you know they are in the Phone Zone without even seeing the rest of their body.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago

That's the neat part when you blur the lines between the government and the private sector. So-called leaders who are interested in power, control, and "winning" more than upholding their oaths of office can just use the private sector to do the things the government is restricted from doing. Then when their businesses can't compete on their own, they can lean on the legal + force options the government has.

I'm starting to think this habit we have of electing selfish sociopathic bad-faith actors to powerful positions of service is less than optimal.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One hand yeah. I fortunately run Linux at work and most of Microsoft's fuckups are just fun Lemmy threads for me.

But the company is a Dell + M365 corporation like the last few places I've worked, so I DO get the privilege of using Teams and Outlook in a browser. Good lord has it been slow lately, but good on them at least for the functionality being there.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

It seems like a pretty common thing for people to expect that the luxuries of modern technology include not having to do anything you don't want to, including being present for your own life.

People make self-destructive choices every day. (insert "always have been" 🌏🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀)

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Now there's a term I have to find a way to use at work tomorrow!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why don't presidents fight the war?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

"Linux ISOs" would stop being the obvious legal use of p2p!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

The History of Superpower Implosion Speedrun World Records

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I say we shouldn't take any platforms "seriously."

This platform is small and open and hosted by volunteer individuals. That is what makes it nice for most of us, but it also means there will always be a variety in who you interact with and it will never be a consistent homogenous branded product.

The huge corporate platforms kind of flip that - you get a massive user base and a very intentionally designed user experience, but everything else about it is a nightmare.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That miata concept sounds fun. But would it be more fun than one that has revs and gears, even though it would be way faster?

Honestly the ideal in my case might be like 2500lbs and 300hp but only like 100 miles of range to keep the battery size down. But I don't think that's gonna happen.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You are correct, but that does not absolve the companies or the government of any responsibility. It should not be "anything goes" as far as intentionally addictive designs on anything with a screen for the same reason they can't just put cocaine in Doritos. They still engineer in what they can, but with some guardrails. And even in that case the regulations here in the US leave a lot to be desired.

view more: ‹ prev next ›