More edge than point.
abbotsbury
In c/greentext, it doesn't matter if the post is a greentext? "This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon"
This doesn't even tell a story, it's just a random 4chan thread.
Not a greentext
No, you missed the point.
I know what greentexts are, just because I think yours is low effort slop doesn't mean I need it explained.
A) 4Chan isn't dead
B) Greentexts are a part of imageboard culture in general
is the date cropped because it's from today? because it seems like you went looking for the first post with greentext for the purpose of submitting anything
aww fuck he got me
I really donβt see this as a negative strawman
All strawmen are negative, if a person (or their argument) needs to be caricatured to be attacked, it shouldn't be attacked. If it can be attacked and you're just caricaturing for fun, then you're diluting the argument and shouldn't.
Anyone using the word Obongo to refer to Obama does not make that distinction
idk, that's a strawman. Obongo is often just used as a funny word because it's 4chan
Sure, that's plausible, but that's also just 4chan lingo.
Putting ideology ("voting legitimizes the illegitimate authority") over pragmatism is goofy IMO. Like, whether you view the state as legitimate or not, in the here-and-now it exists and has power, giving up your influence because you don't like it is counterproductive.
Also this post reeks of Sovereign Citizen nonsense, "I do not consent to being ruled" okay well you are, might as well have a say in the rules.