acchariya

joined 1 year ago
[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

currently depends on having a working-age population that is large enough to support the non-working population

This is only a problem if production does not increase dramatically, as it has for the last century. The reason it feels like there are insufficient working people is because parasites siphon from the resource distribution between more and more productive workers and their non working counterparts

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Confidence is indistinguishable from correctness if you lack competence and experience. Now in addition to the competent and experienced having to interpret the requirements and do the work, they must also sift through half baked AI solutions.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Id go so far as to say SaaS in general. Small startups are paying $5000/month to send emails and we've come to the point where inboxes are monopolized and if you don't pay up to a cloud provider your emails end up in spam.

Take this and repeat for everything. Monopolize, ratchet up the costs, profit.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Windows phone 10 had most of these things in 2015

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It would have deposited the funds in an account "foobar123" and been lost forever

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I'm in the market, and the answer is kinda, for non Teslas. I do a road trip up the east coast a few times a year and the Tesla will reliably add about 4 30 minute stops on each half of the trip. A non Tesla also requires four stops, but they could be anywhere from 20 minutes best case to 1 hr plus, depending on the availability and status of the unreliable chargers.

A lucid with 400 miles of true range would probably cut it down to two stops, but I don't have $140k

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I experienced this too, and landed at a smart company that paid me for the time I spent on the take home project. Yes, it's less money than I might earn at a more prestigious company who abused my time, but I've also successfully selected for a company that has a good working environment.

They have an engineer for probably 30% less than what I demanded from another company with a dumb hiring practice. The dumb company was willing to give me the money too, but I was annoyed with their process so I told them I would not work for them unless they put a four day work week in my offer.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You are right about not getting Facebook to pay for the data, but each time a company pays you $2 to be referred to their site, that's $2 Facebook didn't receive. Anything you earn on TARTLE comes directly out of the purse of big tech.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Disclosure: I'm affiliated with this company.

There's a platform where you can add personal data in the form of questionnaires, documents, and integrations that pull profile data from social media, then allows you to sell the data to buyers at your discretion. The platform does not own your data, does not access it, and simply acts as a broker directly between you and the buyer. Not a ton of activity on it at the moment, but it's picking up as clients shift spending from big tech to pay users for their own acquisition.

https://tartle.co