you say that like people don't watch playthroughs on youtube and twitch.
acosmichippo
it’s not just a matter of safety, efficiency also plummets above 55mph for very little benefit.
i mean there was the whole Dark Ages thing.
It’s not even worth talking about how all the Republican party stands for anymore is triggering others while acting like they’re not actively trying to trigger others.
also while getting triggered themselves as much as possible.
I've been playing https://cluesbysam.com/ a lot recently. It's a (free) daily logic puzzle, so not really story-driven, but it is 100% text based.
that's what the AI is for.
So they used to be ridiculously cool, but they’re still ridiculously cool too.
makes me think it’s inevitable that they reverse their position on console exclusive games.
Because hydrogen isn’t trying to replace the source of energy, it is trying to replace the storage of it
yes, but the point is renewables>battery storage is a more direct and efficient storage system than renewables>hydrogen which then has to be contained, shipped, and distributed for every refill/charge. Batteries you make once and recharge thousands of times which you can do with distribution through the grid from your local power utility (or even right at home if you have solar).
at present batteries are not nearly good enough for the EV only transportation boom, but hydrogen works and only really needs to deal with the volatility issue
it's not just volatility that's an issue. Even setting that aside, Hydrogen is difficult to contain because it's such a small molecule, and it weakens/corrodes metals. These are not trivial challenges at all.
the other thing you can’t do with hydrogen is energy recovery via braking, so you’d have to build cars with a battery or some other kind of hybrid system for fuel cost efficiency.
It's true that batteries present their own challenges but we are making much more progress in battery tech than we are with hydrogen.
Dont most people know that?
most people do not know that in my experience.
thought the promise is that you could establish a hydrogen infrastructure and it would get greener over time - similar to EV’s which get greener over time as power generation includes more renewables.
why should we use renewables to produce hydrogen (not to mention develop an entirely new hydrogen infrastructure) when we could just use that renewable energy as it is? That's just adding extra steps and inefficiency for very little benefit, if any.
One of the most satisfying parts of owning an EV is thinking about all that industry that no longer needs to exist.
agreed.
that wouldn't be "turned off by default".