admin

Well, just a month ago they couldn't pay out a bounty to Kaspersky for a 0day exploit they found due to the sanctions, so this seems a little off.

Who knows, maybe it'll teach people to be more skeptical of the things they read online, and actually look for the underlying sources.

But why wouldn't those same limits not apply to biological controllers? A neuron is basically a transistor.

Because people don't read articles, and this way OP can still get the rage-engagement

In a way, that's what I'm contributing to now as well. So that's why I'm not even going to

I'd wager the main reason we can't prove or disprove that, is because we have no strict definition of intelligence or sentience to begin with.

For that matter, computers have many more transistors and are already capable of mimicking human emotions - how ethical is that, and why does it differ from bio-based controllers?

The line has been changed to be gender neutral 9 hours ago. Victory!

Oh my. Sometimes Betteridge's law of headlines is wrong.

I was about to mention this example. It's everything you love about mythbusters (doing crazy science experiments), without everything you hate about mythbusters and what made me stop watching. No more constant hopping over between the different myths per episode, or tons of recaps.

Just myths, one at a time, no bullshit.

You, me, a few other people.

I think they may have been rhetorical.

Ah, yes, I do.