On the other hand, if we move from larger and larger models with as much data they can gather to less generic and more specific high quality datasets, I have a feeling there's still a lot to gain. But quality over quantity takes a lot more effort to maintain.
admin
joined 1 year ago
In that case, why would it be more misleading than Cruise Control?
This is not whataboutism - it's looking at the bigger picture. The point is that you should want to prevent all mass surveillance by social media companies. Not force them to sell so that the government can get its greedy paws on the data.
He was imaginary though.
I'm just surprised there's no windmill in either of them. Canals, bikes, tulips... Check check check.
Meanwhile on DALL-E...
Exactly this.
I'd be surprised if OpenAI wasn't already using that data to train with (that is: questions and accepted answers of a high enough threshold). But at least now SO (not the actual users who create the value) is being compensated for it.
Not even sales people, just marketing people without a fixed affiliation. The only people they influence are the people for whom the name influencer is not a red flag that they're being lied to.
Having said that, "influencer" is a lot shorter than that, and at least everyone will know what you mean.
Not sure if the writer had a stronk, or just written by an LLM. It gets rather repetitive later on as well.
*arr!